Two dimensions of product modularity and innovation: the case of R&D teams

Abstract This study investigates the relationship between product modularity and innovation in 101 research and development (R&D) teams. The key contribution and the departure from prior empirical work consists in bringing into relation multidimensional operationalizations of these two concepts. Product modularity is composed of standardization and reconfigurability and innovation of novelty and efficiency. The literature provides arguments for both negative and positive relationships between standardization and the two types of innovation, while positive relationships are argued for product reconfigurability. The empirical findings corroborate most of the theorizing, although negative relationships are found for standardization. This study contributes to the literature by unpacking the understanding of the concept of product modularity in R&D organizations since the multidimensional approach resolves some of the ambiguity from previous studies. The modularity literature long called for studies to empirically investigate product modularity in more than one dimension implying a number of theoretical implications discussed here.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Corporate Change
Published
2024-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtae037
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Product Development and Customization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two dimensions of product modularity and innovation: the case of R&D teams

Daniel Martinez Martin, Stefan Haefliger, Tim de Leeuw
2 citations
Industrial and Corporate Change
Product Development and Customization
1.46
article

Two dimensions of product modularity and innovation: the case of R&D teams

Daniel Martinez Martin, Stefan Haefliger, Tim de Leeuw
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the relationship between product modularity and innovation in 101 research and development (R&D) teams. The key contribution and the departure from prior empirical work consists in bringing into relation multidimensional operationalizations of these two concepts. Product modularity is composed of standardization and reconfigurability and innovation of novelty and efficiency. The literature provides arguments for both negative and positive relationships between standardization and the two types of innovation, while positive relationships are argued for product reconfigurability. The empirical findings corroborate most of the theorizing, although negative relationships are found for standardization. This study contributes to the literature by unpacking the understanding of the concept of product modularity in R&D organizations since the multidimensional approach resolves some of the ambiguity from previous studies. The modularity literature long called for studies to empirically investigate product modularity in more than one dimension implying a number of theoretical implications discussed here.

Industrial and Corporate ChangeVol. 34(5)
TIAS School for Business and Society (NL), St George's, University of London (GB), Stockholm School of Economics (SE), Tilburg University (NL), City St George's, University of London (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Product Development and Customization
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.