Phylogenetic Trees Defined by at Most Three Characters

In evolutionary biology, phylogenetic trees are commonly inferred from a set of characters (partitions) of a collection of biological entities (e.g., species or individuals in a population). Such characters naturally arise from molecular sequences or morphological data. Interestingly, it has been known for some time that any binary phylogenetic tree can be (convexly) defined by a set of at most four characters, and that there are binary phylogenetic trees for which three characters are not enough. Thus, it is of interest to characterise those phylogenetic trees that are defined by a set of at most three characters. In this paper, we provide such a characterisation, in particular proving that a binary phylogenetic tree $T$ is defined by a set of at most three dcharacters precisely if $T$ has no internal subtree isomorphic to a certain tree.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37236/12560
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phylogenetic Trees Defined by at Most Three Characters

Katharina T. Huber, Simone Linz, Vincent Moulton, Charles Semple
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
article

Phylogenetic Trees Defined by at Most Three Characters

Katharina T. Huber, Simone Linz, Vincent Moulton, Charles Semple
article en

Abstract

In evolutionary biology, phylogenetic trees are commonly inferred from a set of characters (partitions) of a collection of biological entities (e.g., species or individuals in a population). Such characters naturally arise from molecular sequences or morphological data. Interestingly, it has been known for some time that any binary phylogenetic tree can be (convexly) defined by a set of at most four characters, and that there are binary phylogenetic trees for which three characters are not enough. Thus, it is of interest to characterise those phylogenetic trees that are defined by a set of at most three characters. In this paper, we provide such a characterisation, in particular proving that a binary phylogenetic tree $T$ is defined by a set of at most three dcharacters precisely if $T$ has no internal subtree isomorphic to a certain tree.

The Electronic Journal of CombinatoricsVol. 31(4)
University of East Anglia (GB), University of Auckland (NZ), University of Canterbury (NZ)
University of Canterbury, Royal Society, National University of Singapore, Marsden Fund, Division of Mathematical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Phylogenetic Trees Defined by at Most Three Characters — Katharina T. Huber, Simone Linz, et al. · The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS