Octane Response of Gasoline Fuels to Different Antiknock Oxygenates Addition

Abstract A series of renewable and clean oxygenated compounds possessing high octane numbers, including alcohols, ethers, esters, and furans, were used as octane boosters for gasoline fuels, and the octane responses of the gasoline fuels to these oxygenates addition were evaluated. Gasoline model fuels of different typical hydrocarbon compounds, including iso-octane, n-heptane, toluene, diisobutylene, and cyclohexane, were designed to have the identical octane rating. The research octane number (RON) and motor octane number (MON) of the gasoline model fuels with antiknock oxygenates addition were experimentally measured on a standard cooperative fuel research (CFR) engine. The results highlight the varied impact of antiknock oxygenates on the octane enhancement of gasoline fuels, with 2-methylfuran exhibiting the most pronounced RON boost effect and ethanol demonstrating the strongest MON enhancement effects, and isopropyl ether and dimethyl carbonate show the weakest RON and MON boost effects, respectively. The antiknock enhancement effects of the oxygenated additives are dependent on gasoline fuel compositions. With the antiknock oxygenates addition, primary reference fuel (PRF) model fuel shows more significant octane enhancements, and the octane boosting effects are reduced for the gasoline model fuels containing toluene or diisobutylene, indicating an antagonistic interaction between the oxygenates and toluene/diisobutylene. By comparing the octane enhancement effects of the tested antiknock additives, it is evident that 2-methylfuran and ethanol are the more superior antiknock candidates for gasoline fuels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of energy resources technology.
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4067060
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Octane Response of Gasoline Fuels to Different Antiknock Oxygenates Addition

Delin Lyu, Dong Han, Zhen Huang, Xuanjie Cui
2 citations
Journal of energy resources technology.
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
0.44
article

Octane Response of Gasoline Fuels to Different Antiknock Oxygenates Addition

Delin Lyu, Dong Han, Zhen Huang, Xuanjie Cui
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract A series of renewable and clean oxygenated compounds possessing high octane numbers, including alcohols, ethers, esters, and furans, were used as octane boosters for gasoline fuels, and the octane responses of the gasoline fuels to these oxygenates addition were evaluated. Gasoline model fuels of different typical hydrocarbon compounds, including iso-octane, n-heptane, toluene, diisobutylene, and cyclohexane, were designed to have the identical octane rating. The research octane number (RON) and motor octane number (MON) of the gasoline model fuels with antiknock oxygenates addition were experimentally measured on a standard cooperative fuel research (CFR) engine. The results highlight the varied impact of antiknock oxygenates on the octane enhancement of gasoline fuels, with 2-methylfuran exhibiting the most pronounced RON boost effect and ethanol demonstrating the strongest MON enhancement effects, and isopropyl ether and dimethyl carbonate show the weakest RON and MON boost effects, respectively. The antiknock enhancement effects of the oxygenated additives are dependent on gasoline fuel compositions. With the antiknock oxygenates addition, primary reference fuel (PRF) model fuel shows more significant octane enhancements, and the octane boosting effects are reduced for the gasoline model fuels containing toluene or diisobutylene, indicating an antagonistic interaction between the oxygenates and toluene/diisobutylene. By comparing the octane enhancement effects of the tested antiknock additives, it is evident that 2-methylfuran and ethanol are the more superior antiknock candidates for gasoline fuels.

Journal of energy resources technology.Vol. 1(3)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), SAIC-GM (China) (CN), Institute of Power Engineering (PL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
0.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Octane Response of Gasoline Fuels to Different Antiknock Oxygenates Addition — Delin Lyu, Dong Han, et al. · Journal of energy resources technology. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS