What to expect from microscopic nuclear modelling for keff calculations?

Comparisons between predicted and benchmark k eff values from criticality-safety systems are often used as metrics to estimate the quality of evaluated nuclear data libraries. Relevant nuclear data for these critical systems generally come from a mixture of expert knowledge and phenomenological predictions. In the present work, we use solely microscopic nuclear modelling from TALYS to estimate actinides cross sections and angular distributions, and we compare the calculated MCNP k eff values for fast systems between the JEFF-3.3 evaluated library, phenomenological and microscopic modelling. The conclusion is that even if the evaluated library leads to the most adequate results, the microscopic nuclear modelling can reach very similar results for these integral quantities. It demonstrates the remarkable advances in the recent decades of microscopic nuclear reaction ingredients for applied integral observables.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Physics A
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2024.122979
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Nuclear physics research studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What to expect from microscopic nuclear modelling for keff calculations?

A. J. Koning, S. Goriely, D. Rochman, S. Hilaire
2 citations
Nuclear Physics A
Nuclear physics research studies
1.32
article

What to expect from microscopic nuclear modelling for keff calculations?

A. J. Koning, S. Goriely, D. Rochman, S. Hilaire
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Comparisons between predicted and benchmark k eff values from criticality-safety systems are often used as metrics to estimate the quality of evaluated nuclear data libraries. Relevant nuclear data for these critical systems generally come from a mixture of expert knowledge and phenomenological predictions. In the present work, we use solely microscopic nuclear modelling from TALYS to estimate actinides cross sections and angular distributions, and we compare the calculated MCNP k eff values for fast systems between the JEFF-3.3 evaluated library, phenomenological and microscopic modelling. The conclusion is that even if the evaluated library leads to the most adequate results, the microscopic nuclear modelling can reach very similar results for these integral quantities. It demonstrates the remarkable advances in the recent decades of microscopic nuclear reaction ingredients for applied integral observables.

Nuclear Physics AVol. 1054
International Atomic Energy Agency (AT), Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Paul Scherrer Institute (CH), CEA DAM Île-de-France (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR)
European Commission, Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Nuclear physics research studies
1.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.