Pushing AFM to the Boundaries: Interphase Mechanical Property Measurements near a Rigid Body

Understanding the mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposite materials is essential for industrial use. Particularly, the determination of the polymer modulus at the nanofiller–polymer interphase is important for optimizing the interfacial mechanical properties. Nanoindentation via Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) is well-established for measuring the modulus of the interphase region with nanoscale spatial resolution. However, indentation into heterogeneous materials presents a confounding issue often referred to as the “substrate effect”, i.e., the structural stress field caused by the rigid body is convoluted with the actual modulus of the interphase region. While finite element analysis (FEA)-based methods can be used to deconvolute the interphase modulus from measured apparent modulus–distance profiles, the experimental validation of this method is still needed. Here, we provide this validation using AFM nanoindentation on a layered model composite that consists of three layers with different moduli to recapitulate the properties of the matrix, the filler, and the interphase of real polymer nanocomposites. By systematically varying the thickness of the “artificial” interphase layer and the AFM probe radius, we obtain modulus–distance profiles over a wide range of indentation conditions. We validate a method to deconvolute the substrate effect using an empirically derived master curve obtained from FEA analysis. Furthermore, we showed that the effect of the artificial interphase on modulus– distance profiles can be distinguished only if the interphase layer is thick enough compared to the contact radius of the probe. Finally, we established an innovative and quantitative framework to predict the interphase thickness from mechanical nanoindentation measurements and discussed the lower, practical limit for interphase thickness determination. In summary, we provide a broadly applicable method to extract interphase mechanical properties of multiphase soft materials and practical guidelines for choosing optimal characterization conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Macromolecules
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.4c01993
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pushing AFM to the Boundaries: Interphase Mechanical Property Measurements near a Rigid Body

L. Catherine Brinson, Richard J. Sheridan, Stefan Zauscher, I. Saito
7 citations
Macromolecules
Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
1.88
article

Pushing AFM to the Boundaries: Interphase Mechanical Property Measurements near a Rigid Body

L. Catherine Brinson, Richard J. Sheridan, Stefan Zauscher, I. Saito
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Understanding the mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposite materials is essential for industrial use. Particularly, the determination of the polymer modulus at the nanofiller–polymer interphase is important for optimizing the interfacial mechanical properties. Nanoindentation via Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) is well-established for measuring the modulus of the interphase region with nanoscale spatial resolution. However, indentation into heterogeneous materials presents a confounding issue often referred to as the “substrate effect”, i.e., the structural stress field caused by the rigid body is convoluted with the actual modulus of the interphase region. While finite element analysis (FEA)-based methods can be used to deconvolute the interphase modulus from measured apparent modulus–distance profiles, the experimental validation of this method is still needed. Here, we provide this validation using AFM nanoindentation on a layered model composite that consists of three layers with different moduli to recapitulate the properties of the matrix, the filler, and the interphase of real polymer nanocomposites. By systematically varying the thickness of the “artificial” interphase layer and the AFM probe radius, we obtain modulus–distance profiles over a wide range of indentation conditions. We validate a method to deconvolute the substrate effect using an empirically derived master curve obtained from FEA analysis. Furthermore, we showed that the effect of the artificial interphase on modulus– distance profiles can be distinguished only if the interphase layer is thick enough compared to the contact radius of the probe. Finally, we established an innovative and quantitative framework to predict the interphase thickness from mechanical nanoindentation measurements and discussed the lower, practical limit for interphase thickness determination. In summary, we provide a broadly applicable method to extract interphase mechanical properties of multiphase soft materials and practical guidelines for choosing optimal characterization conditions.

MacromoleculesVol. 58(2)
Duke University (US)
Japan Student Services Organization, Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.