Neuronavigated Focalized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Administered During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that allows the modulation of the excitability and plasticity of the human brain. Focalized tDCS setups use specific electrode arrangements to constrain the current flow to circumscribed brain regions. However, the effectiveness of focalized tDCS can be compromised by electrode positioning errors on the scalp, resulting in significant reductions of the current dose reaching the target brain regions for tDCS. Electrode placement guided by neuronavigation based on the individual's head and brain anatomy derived from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data may be suited to improve positioning accuracy. This protocol describes the method of neuronavigated electrode placement for a focalized tDCS setup, which is suitable for concurrent administration during functional MRI (fMRI). We also quantify the accuracy of electrode placement and investigate electrode drift in a concurrent tDCS-fMRI experiment. Critical steps involve the optimization of electrode positions based on current modeling that considers the individual's head and brain anatomy, the implementation of neuronavigated electrode placement on the scalp, and the administration of optimized and focal tDCS during fMRI. The regional precision of electrode placement is quantified using the Euclidean norm (L<sup>2 </sup>Norm) to determine deviations of the actual from the intended electrode positions during a concurrent tDCS-fMRI study. Any potential displacement of electrodes (drift) during the experiment is investigated by comparing actual electrode positions before and after the fMRI acquisition. In addition, we directly compare the placement accuracy of neuronavigated tDCS to that achieved by a scalp-based targeting approach (a 10-20 Electroencephalography (EEG) system). These analyses demonstrate superior placement accuracy for neuronavigation compared to scalp-based electrode placement and negligible electrode drift across a 20 min scanning period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3791/67155
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neuronavigated Focalized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Administered During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Alexander Hunold, Felix Blankenburg, Gesa Hartwigsen, Andrew Martin et al.
12 citations
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
2.97
article

Neuronavigated Focalized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Administered During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Alexander Hunold, Felix Blankenburg, Gesa Hartwigsen, Andrew Martin, Alireza Shahbabaie, Mohamed Abdelmotaleb, Anna Elisabeth Fromm, Dayana Hayek, Agnes Flöel, Steffen Riemann, Robert Malinowski, Michael A. Nitsche, Rico Fischer, Dagmar Timmann, Axel Thielscher, Marcus Meinzer, Filip Niemann, Sven Paßmann, Harun Kocataş, Ann-Kathrin Hubert, Daria Antonenko, Leonardo M. Caisachana Guevara, Shu Li
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that allows the modulation of the excitability and plasticity of the human brain. Focalized tDCS setups use specific electrode arrangements to constrain the current flow to circumscribed brain regions. However, the effectiveness of focalized tDCS can be compromised by electrode positioning errors on the scalp, resulting in significant reductions of the current dose reaching the target brain regions for tDCS. Electrode placement guided by neuronavigation based on the individual's head and brain anatomy derived from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data may be suited to improve positioning accuracy. This protocol describes the method of neuronavigated electrode placement for a focalized tDCS setup, which is suitable for concurrent administration during functional MRI (fMRI). We also quantify the accuracy of electrode placement and investigate electrode drift in a concurrent tDCS-fMRI experiment. Critical steps involve the optimization of electrode positions based on current modeling that considers the individual's head and brain anatomy, the implementation of neuronavigated electrode placement on the scalp, and the administration of optimized and focal tDCS during fMRI. The regional precision of electrode placement is quantified using the Euclidean norm (L<sup>2 </sup>Norm) to determine deviations of the actual from the intended electrode positions during a concurrent tDCS-fMRI study. Any potential displacement of electrodes (drift) during the experiment is investigated by comparing actual electrode positions before and after the fMRI acquisition. In addition, we directly compare the placement accuracy of neuronavigated tDCS to that achieved by a scalp-based targeting approach (a 10-20 Electroencephalography (EEG) system). These analyses demonstrate superior placement accuracy for neuronavigation compared to scalp-based electrode placement and negligible electrode drift across a 20 min scanning period.

Journal of Visualized Experiments(213)
Technische Universität Ilmenau (DE), Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE), Universität Greifswald (DE), Essen University Hospital (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
2.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.