Benchmarking of monocular camera UAV-based localization and mapping methods in vineyards

• UAV-based localization and mapping methods have been benchmarked in vineyards. • Five evaluation metrics were developed for agricultural scenarios. • Lighting variation impacts point cloud resolution. • Deep learning enhances SLAM for efficient plant phenotyping. UAVs equipped with various sensors offer a promising approach for enhancing orchard management efficiency. Up-close sensing enables precise crop localization and mapping, providing valuable a priori information for informed decision-making. Current research on localization and mapping methods can be broadly classified into SfM, traditional feature-based SLAM, and deep learning-integrated SLAM. While previous studies have evaluated these methods on public datasets, real-world agricultural environments, particularly vineyards, present unique challenges due to their complexity, dynamism, and unstructured nature. To bridge this gap, we conducted a comprehensive study in vineyards, collecting data under diverse conditions (flight modes, illumination conditions, and shooting angles) using a UAV equipped with high-resolution camera. To assess the performance of different methods, we proposed five evaluation metrics: efficiency, point cloud completeness, localization accuracy, parameter sensitivity, and plant-level spatial accuracy. We compared two SLAM approaches against SfM as a benchmark. Our findings reveal that deep learning-based SLAM outperforms SfM and feature-based SLAM in terms of position accuracy and point cloud resolution. Deep learning-based SLAM reduced average position error by 87% and increased point cloud resolution by 571%. However, feature-based SLAM demonstrated superior efficiency, making it a more suitable choice for real-time applications. These results offer valuable insights for selecting appropriate methods, considering illumination conditions, and optimizing parameters to balance accuracy and computational efficiency in orchard management activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.109661
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking of monocular camera UAV-based localization and mapping methods in vineyards

Sergio Vélez, Lammert Kooistra, João Valente, Yaowu Wang et al.
10 citations
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
2.06
article

Benchmarking of monocular camera UAV-based localization and mapping methods in vineyards

Sergio Vélez, Lammert Kooistra, João Valente, Yaowu Wang, Wensheng Wang, Kaiwen Wang
article en
10 citations

Abstract

• UAV-based localization and mapping methods have been benchmarked in vineyards. • Five evaluation metrics were developed for agricultural scenarios. • Lighting variation impacts point cloud resolution. • Deep learning enhances SLAM for efficient plant phenotyping. UAVs equipped with various sensors offer a promising approach for enhancing orchard management efficiency. Up-close sensing enables precise crop localization and mapping, providing valuable a priori information for informed decision-making. Current research on localization and mapping methods can be broadly classified into SfM, traditional feature-based SLAM, and deep learning-integrated SLAM. While previous studies have evaluated these methods on public datasets, real-world agricultural environments, particularly vineyards, present unique challenges due to their complexity, dynamism, and unstructured nature. To bridge this gap, we conducted a comprehensive study in vineyards, collecting data under diverse conditions (flight modes, illumination conditions, and shooting angles) using a UAV equipped with high-resolution camera. To assess the performance of different methods, we proposed five evaluation metrics: efficiency, point cloud completeness, localization accuracy, parameter sensitivity, and plant-level spatial accuracy. We compared two SLAM approaches against SfM as a benchmark. Our findings reveal that deep learning-based SLAM outperforms SfM and feature-based SLAM in terms of position accuracy and point cloud resolution. Deep learning-based SLAM reduced average position error by 87% and increased point cloud resolution by 571%. However, feature-based SLAM demonstrated superior efficiency, making it a more suitable choice for real-time applications. These results offer valuable insights for selecting appropriate methods, considering illumination conditions, and optimizing parameters to balance accuracy and computational efficiency in orchard management activities.

Computers and Electronics in AgricultureVol. 227
Agricultural Information Institute (CN), Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (DE), Centre for Automation and Robotics (ES), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Wageningen University and Research Centre, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wageningen University and Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.