Testing for genetic and viral etiologies in congenital hearing loss based on a survey of cochlear implant centers: proposed HEARRING group consensus and future directions

BACKGROUND: In cases of congenital sensorineural hearing loss, testing for genetic etiologies and congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection have become common practice. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine which specific testing methodologies should be used and when. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We surveyed 20 practicing otolaryngologists across eighteen institutions in thirteen countries about their approach to cCMV, GJB2, and wider genetic testing. RESULTS: We found 90% of respondents employ all three tests, either in routine or special cases. cCMV testing is widely used, with 95% of respondents incorporating it into their clinical practice. GJB2 testing was employed by 90%. In cases with negative GJB2 test results, a majority of respondents proceeded to wider genetic screening. Test reimbursement was also examined for each test. For cCMV testing, 63.1% reported reimbursement, 68.4% reported reimbursement for GJB2 variant testing and 52.6% reported reimbursement for wider genetic screening. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: A common approach is to perform cCMV and GJB2 testing as the first tests, followed by wider genetic testing. This study offers insight into the prevalence, methodologies, and reimbursement status of these testing methodologies across multiple hearing centers and countries. Current consensus and future directions are described based on the current survey.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/vvxy-j281
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing for genetic and viral etiologies in congenital hearing loss based on a survey of cochlear implant centers: proposed HEARRING group consensus and future directions

Abdulrahman Abdullah Hagr, Javiér Gavilán, Mohan Kameswaran, Aanand Acharya et al.
UNC Libraries
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Testing for genetic and viral etiologies in congenital hearing loss based on a survey of cochlear implant centers: proposed HEARRING group consensus and future directions

Abdulrahman Abdullah Hagr, Javiér Gavilán, Mohan Kameswaran, Aanand Acharya, S. B. Sugarova, Griet Mertens, Vedat Topsakal, Hinrich Staecker, Paul Van de Heyning, Vincent Van Rompaey, Thomas Parzefall, Sumit Maheshwari, Luis Lassaletta, Shin‐ya Nishio, Mario Zernotti, Stefan Volkenstein, Anne Morgan Selleck, Shin‐ichi Usami, Wafaa Shehata-Dieler, Christiane Völter, Kristen Rak, Chris Raine, Timo Stöver, Yongxin Li
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In cases of congenital sensorineural hearing loss, testing for genetic etiologies and congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection have become common practice. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine which specific testing methodologies should be used and when. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We surveyed 20 practicing otolaryngologists across eighteen institutions in thirteen countries about their approach to cCMV, GJB2, and wider genetic testing. RESULTS: We found 90% of respondents employ all three tests, either in routine or special cases. cCMV testing is widely used, with 95% of respondents incorporating it into their clinical practice. GJB2 testing was employed by 90%. In cases with negative GJB2 test results, a majority of respondents proceeded to wider genetic screening. Test reimbursement was also examined for each test. For cCMV testing, 63.1% reported reimbursement, 68.4% reported reimbursement for GJB2 variant testing and 52.6% reported reimbursement for wider genetic screening. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: A common approach is to perform cCMV and GJB2 testing as the first tests, followed by wider genetic testing. This study offers insight into the prevalence, methodologies, and reimbursement status of these testing methodologies across multiple hearing centers and countries. Current consensus and future directions are described based on the current survey.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.