Generosity as Ethics

A reinterpretation of Mauss’s The Gift reveals—besides its central topic, reciprocity—another implicit theme of generosity, which Mauss was criticized for having ignored. This renders the gift a double transaction. Generosity is a movement away from the self, constituting ethics as envisaged by Levinas. Introducing ethics into the context of the gift allows us to identify points missed by Mauss’s supporters and his critics. Mauss locates generosity primarily in exchanges with the mythical world that we identify as “the beyond,” that is, as a cultural expression of Levinas’s “other.” The other, as an ethical template expressed in generosity, transcends the cultural moralities of reciprocity. This ethical dimension eludes a utilitarian rationality that centers on the self and renders the notion of a “pure gift” impossible. Bataille and Derrida find no escape from this conundrum, but the Maussian double transaction resolves it. We explore this resolution via new insights into the ambiguities of the South Asian “pure gift” dan, examined in the Muslim Punjab.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Anthropology
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/733308
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Anthropological Studies and Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generosity as Ethics

3 citations
Current Anthropology
Anthropological Studies and Insights
11.16
article

Generosity as Ethics

article en
3 citations

Abstract

A reinterpretation of Mauss’s The Gift reveals—besides its central topic, reciprocity—another implicit theme of generosity, which Mauss was criticized for having ignored. This renders the gift a double transaction. Generosity is a movement away from the self, constituting ethics as envisaged by Levinas. Introducing ethics into the context of the gift allows us to identify points missed by Mauss’s supporters and his critics. Mauss locates generosity primarily in exchanges with the mythical world that we identify as “the beyond,” that is, as a cultural expression of Levinas’s “other.” The other, as an ethical template expressed in generosity, transcends the cultural moralities of reciprocity. This ethical dimension eludes a utilitarian rationality that centers on the self and renders the notion of a “pure gift” impossible. Bataille and Derrida find no escape from this conundrum, but the Maussian double transaction resolves it. We explore this resolution via new insights into the ambiguities of the South Asian “pure gift” dan, examined in the Muslim Punjab.

Current AnthropologyVol. 65(6)
Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Anthropological Studies and Insights
11.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.