Assessing the Efficacy of Modified CT Severity Index Versus Conventional CT Severity Index in Determining Severity and Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate the severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using the computed tomography severity index (CTSI) and the modified CTSI (MCTSI) and to assess their correlation with clinical outcome measures. Additionally, the study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of these indices in predicting moderate to severe COPD, based on patient outcomes. Materials and methods In this prospective study, conducted between November 2023 and March 2024, two radiologists, blinded to clinical outcomes, independently assessed CTSI and MCTSI. Clinical outcomes evaluated included the duration of hospital stay, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, organ failure (OF), evidence of infection, need for intervention, and mortality. Results The study included 60 COPD patients, with a majority being male (40, 66.7%) and a mean age of 65.4 ± 8.6 years. Based on CTSI, severity was classified as mild in 25 (41.7%), moderate in 20 (33.3%), and severe in 15 (25.0%) cases. According to MCTSI, severity was classified as mild in 22 (36.7%), moderate in 15 (25.0%), and severe in 23 (38.3%) cases. MCTSI showed concordance with the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification in 54 (90.0%) cases, while CTSI was concordant in 47 (78.3%) cases. For predicting moderate to severe COPD, CTSI demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.4%, specificity of 96.0%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 97.1%, and overall accuracy of 98.3%. MCTSI showed a sensitivity of 94.4%, specificity of 92.0%, PPV of 94.4%, and accuracy of 96.7%. Both indices correlated significantly with clinical outcomes, including OF, need for intervention, infection, and mortality (p < 0.001), although no significant correlation was found with ICU stay. Conclusion Both CTSI and MCTSI demonstrated a strong correlation with clinical outcomes in COPD patients and showed good concordance with severity assessments. MCTSI exhibited higher sensitivity, while CTSI demonstrated greater specificity for differentiating mild from moderate/severe COPD cases. These indices can be valuable tools in guiding clinical decision-making and assessing disease severity in COPD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.73771
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Efficacy of Modified CT Severity Index Versus Conventional CT Severity Index in Determining Severity and Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Fadi Al‐Rashid, Ibrahim Khan, Nawaf Alshammari, Sanjay Kirshan Kumar et al.
1 links
Cureus
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Assessing the Efficacy of Modified CT Severity Index Versus Conventional CT Severity Index in Determining Severity and Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Fadi Al‐Rashid, Ibrahim Khan, Nawaf Alshammari, Sanjay Kirshan Kumar, Asim N. Cheema, Hamid Manzoor, Jawad Hussain, H Butt, Gul Sharif
article en

Abstract

Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate the severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using the computed tomography severity index (CTSI) and the modified CTSI (MCTSI) and to assess their correlation with clinical outcome measures. Additionally, the study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of these indices in predicting moderate to severe COPD, based on patient outcomes. Materials and methods In this prospective study, conducted between November 2023 and March 2024, two radiologists, blinded to clinical outcomes, independently assessed CTSI and MCTSI. Clinical outcomes evaluated included the duration of hospital stay, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, organ failure (OF), evidence of infection, need for intervention, and mortality. Results The study included 60 COPD patients, with a majority being male (40, 66.7%) and a mean age of 65.4 ± 8.6 years. Based on CTSI, severity was classified as mild in 25 (41.7%), moderate in 20 (33.3%), and severe in 15 (25.0%) cases. According to MCTSI, severity was classified as mild in 22 (36.7%), moderate in 15 (25.0%), and severe in 23 (38.3%) cases. MCTSI showed concordance with the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification in 54 (90.0%) cases, while CTSI was concordant in 47 (78.3%) cases. For predicting moderate to severe COPD, CTSI demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.4%, specificity of 96.0%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 97.1%, and overall accuracy of 98.3%. MCTSI showed a sensitivity of 94.4%, specificity of 92.0%, PPV of 94.4%, and accuracy of 96.7%. Both indices correlated significantly with clinical outcomes, including OF, need for intervention, infection, and mortality (p < 0.001), although no significant correlation was found with ICU stay. Conclusion Both CTSI and MCTSI demonstrated a strong correlation with clinical outcomes in COPD patients and showed good concordance with severity assessments. MCTSI exhibited higher sensitivity, while CTSI demonstrated greater specificity for differentiating mild from moderate/severe COPD cases. These indices can be valuable tools in guiding clinical decision-making and assessing disease severity in COPD.

CureusVol. 16(11)
CMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry (PK), Lady Reading Hospital (PK), Civil Hospital Karachi (PK), University of Ha'il (SA), GIFT University (PK), Narayan Medical College and Hospital (IN), Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (GB), National Guard Health Affairs (SA), Bahria University (PK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.