Artificial Impacts on the Moon: Modeling 3D Seismic Propagation Effects with AxiSEM3D

Abstract During the Apollo missions, used spacecraft were deliberately crashed into the Moon to provide large signals for the seismic experiments. We use AxiSEM3D and a variety of 1D and 3D models to model these impacts and propagate seismic waves across the Moon in 3D. Simulations using a smoothly varying background model, which include scattering heterogeneities to 50 km depth, reproduced some of the observations, especially farther from the source. These simulations have an emergent onset and an increase and decay in the seismic envelope. However, close to the source (<15°), the simulations include a large-amplitude surface wave, which is inconsistent with the observations. Traditionally, artificial and meteoroid impacts on the Moon have been considered to have P and S phases. However, a true S phase may be absent. Previous authors have treated artificial or meteoroid impacts on airless bodies as explosions. A shear wave traveling directly from the source is not expected from an explosion. Instead, the small change of the slope of the seismic envelope may be explained by either a PS phase or scattered phases of P-to-SV conversions that start to dominate the seismogram. The locations of the artificial impacts are well known in comparison with other types of events. Due to their shallow paths, they are also ideal for constraining the near-surface layers. Understanding how the seismic waves propagate within the highly complex near-surface layers will also lead to a better understanding of how the waves propagate beneath them, as well as better results from future missions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Planetary Science Journal
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/psj/ad83d2
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Impacts on the Moon: Modeling 3D Seismic Propagation Effects with AxiSEM3D

Ceri Nunn, M. P. Panning, Benjamin Fernando
4 citations
The Planetary Science Journal
Planetary Science and Exploration
1.33
article

Artificial Impacts on the Moon: Modeling 3D Seismic Propagation Effects with AxiSEM3D

Ceri Nunn, M. P. Panning, Benjamin Fernando
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract During the Apollo missions, used spacecraft were deliberately crashed into the Moon to provide large signals for the seismic experiments. We use AxiSEM3D and a variety of 1D and 3D models to model these impacts and propagate seismic waves across the Moon in 3D. Simulations using a smoothly varying background model, which include scattering heterogeneities to 50 km depth, reproduced some of the observations, especially farther from the source. These simulations have an emergent onset and an increase and decay in the seismic envelope. However, close to the source (<15°), the simulations include a large-amplitude surface wave, which is inconsistent with the observations. Traditionally, artificial and meteoroid impacts on the Moon have been considered to have P and S phases. However, a true S phase may be absent. Previous authors have treated artificial or meteoroid impacts on airless bodies as explosions. A shear wave traveling directly from the source is not expected from an explosion. Instead, the small change of the slope of the seismic envelope may be explained by either a PS phase or scattered phases of P-to-SV conversions that start to dominate the seismogram. The locations of the artificial impacts are well known in comparison with other types of events. Due to their shallow paths, they are also ideal for constraining the near-surface layers. Understanding how the seismic waves propagate within the highly complex near-surface layers will also lead to a better understanding of how the waves propagate beneath them, as well as better results from future missions.

The Planetary Science JournalVol. 5(11)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Planetary Science and Exploration
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.