CLASSIFICATION OF BREAST LYMPHEDEMA IN A RACIALLY DIVERSE COHORT

Breast lymphedema is a common sequela of breast conservation that delays healing and reduces quality of life. No rigorous classification system exists for this condition. We explored approaches for classifying breast lymph-edema based on breast ultrasound, physical exam, and patient-reported outcomes. We enrolled 80 patients from two institutions. Each site enrolled 30 invasive breast cancer patients treated with breast conservation and radiotherapy, and 10 control patients evaluated for benign breast complaints. All patients underwent bilateral breast ultrasound to measure dermal thickness and were assessed for physical signs of breast lymphedema. Patients reported quality of life impacts on standard questionnaires. We derived breast lymphedema classifiers using (1) a simple ultrasound-based metric of dermal thickness difference, and (2) a multiparameter machine learning classifier based on dermal thickness difference, physical exam, and patient-reported impacts. Ultrasound-defined breast lymphedema was present in 72% (95% CI: 59 to 82%) of invasive breast cancer patients. The multiparameter classifier identified three distinct patient groups: one with little evidence of breast lymph-edema, and two with increasingly severe breast lymphedema. A simple ultrasound-based measure and a novel multiparameter classifier both show promise for rigorous classification of breast lymphedema and warrant further development in larger patient cohorts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lymphology
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2458/lymph.7092
Primary Topic
Lymphatic System and Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CLASSIFICATION OF BREAST LYMPHEDEMA IN A RACIALLY DIVERSE COHORT

Jianguo Chen, Davide Rizzo, Emily Watson, Andrew N. Coogan et al.
Lymphology
Lymphatic System and Diseases
article

CLASSIFICATION OF BREAST LYMPHEDEMA IN A RACIALLY DIVERSE COHORT

Jianguo Chen, Davide Rizzo, Emily Watson, Andrew N. Coogan, Michelle Sowden, L.A.P. Sanchez-Johnsen, Claudia B. Perez, Carl Nelson, Thomas P. Ahern, Tae Hyung Kim, Kumiko Ohara, Julia Matt
article en

Abstract

Breast lymphedema is a common sequela of breast conservation that delays healing and reduces quality of life. No rigorous classification system exists for this condition. We explored approaches for classifying breast lymph-edema based on breast ultrasound, physical exam, and patient-reported outcomes. We enrolled 80 patients from two institutions. Each site enrolled 30 invasive breast cancer patients treated with breast conservation and radiotherapy, and 10 control patients evaluated for benign breast complaints. All patients underwent bilateral breast ultrasound to measure dermal thickness and were assessed for physical signs of breast lymphedema. Patients reported quality of life impacts on standard questionnaires. We derived breast lymphedema classifiers using (1) a simple ultrasound-based metric of dermal thickness difference, and (2) a multiparameter machine learning classifier based on dermal thickness difference, physical exam, and patient-reported impacts. Ultrasound-defined breast lymphedema was present in 72% (95% CI: 59 to 82%) of invasive breast cancer patients. The multiparameter classifier identified three distinct patient groups: one with little evidence of breast lymph-edema, and two with increasingly severe breast lymphedema. A simple ultrasound-based measure and a novel multiparameter classifier both show promise for rigorous classification of breast lymphedema and warrant further development in larger patient cohorts.

LymphologyVol. 57(2)
University of Vermont (US), Rush University Medical Center (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), University of Vermont Medical Center (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Lymphatic System and Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.