Back to the roots: standardizing root length density terminology

Abstract The number of studies investigating root length has increased, particularly in the context of root length measurements observed through windows such as minirhizotrons and rhizoboxes. However, there are currently two obstacles constraining their broader utility: (1) the absence of standardized terminology or units for root length data, and (2) the translation from two-dimensional (2D) to three-dimensional (3D) data. Here, we delineate the fundamental disparities between root length measurements obtained from observation windows and via volumetric soil sampling and propose the adoption of more precise terminology to distinguish 2D planar (pRLD) from 3D volumetric (vRLD) root length density measurements. This differentiation should be accompanied with the use of standardized units and should not endeavour to make blanket conversions between dimensions unless this is supported by specific calibration data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plant and Soil
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07075-x
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Back to the roots: standardizing root length density terminology

Tomke Susanne Wacker, Benjamin M. Delory, Johannes A. Postma, Dorte Bodin Dresbøll et al.
8 citations
Plant and Soil
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
4.80
article

Back to the roots: standardizing root length density terminology

Tomke Susanne Wacker, Benjamin M. Delory, Johannes A. Postma, Dorte Bodin Dresbøll, Andrea Schnepf, Frederik van der Bom, Doris Vetterlein, Kerstin Nagel
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract The number of studies investigating root length has increased, particularly in the context of root length measurements observed through windows such as minirhizotrons and rhizoboxes. However, there are currently two obstacles constraining their broader utility: (1) the absence of standardized terminology or units for root length data, and (2) the translation from two-dimensional (2D) to three-dimensional (3D) data. Here, we delineate the fundamental disparities between root length measurements obtained from observation windows and via volumetric soil sampling and propose the adoption of more precise terminology to distinguish 2D planar (pRLD) from 3D volumetric (vRLD) root length density measurements. This differentiation should be accompanied with the use of standardized units and should not endeavour to make blanket conversions between dimensions unless this is supported by specific calibration data.

Plant and SoilVol. 511(1-2)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), Utrecht University (NL)
European Commission, Københavns Universitet
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
4.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.