Assessing the impact of hard data patterns on Bayesian Maximum Entropy: a simulation study

This study empirically tested the robustness of Bayesian Maximum Entropy (BME) in predicting spatiotemporal data, with an emphasis on skewness, sample size, and spatial dependency level. Simulated data, both Gaussian and non-Gaussian, were generated using the unconditional sequential simulation method, with sample sizes ranging from 100 to 500 at the interval length of 50 and varying skewness (0, 1, 3, 6 and 9) and spatial dependency levels (weak, moderate, and strong). Findings revealed sample size variations and spatial dependence levels did not significantly influence BME prediction's Mean Square Error (MSE) and bias. While skewness significantly impacted MSE (p-value < 0.001), bias remained unaffected. Moreover, skewness and spatial dependence interactions affected both MSE and bias. Despite this, BME proved robust to sample size and skewness, demonstrating a negligible MSE on the graphical plot (heatmap).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70518-z
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the impact of hard data patterns on Bayesian Maximum Entropy: a simulation study

Romain Glèlè Kakaï, Emmanuel Ehnon Gongnet, Sèdjro A Tranquillin Affossogbe, Codjo Emile Agbangba et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Climate variability and models
0.57
article

Assessing the impact of hard data patterns on Bayesian Maximum Entropy: a simulation study

Romain Glèlè Kakaï, Emmanuel Ehnon Gongnet, Sèdjro A Tranquillin Affossogbe, Codjo Emile Agbangba, Romaric Vihotogbé
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study empirically tested the robustness of Bayesian Maximum Entropy (BME) in predicting spatiotemporal data, with an emphasis on skewness, sample size, and spatial dependency level. Simulated data, both Gaussian and non-Gaussian, were generated using the unconditional sequential simulation method, with sample sizes ranging from 100 to 500 at the interval length of 50 and varying skewness (0, 1, 3, 6 and 9) and spatial dependency levels (weak, moderate, and strong). Findings revealed sample size variations and spatial dependence levels did not significantly influence BME prediction's Mean Square Error (MSE) and bias. While skewness significantly impacted MSE (p-value < 0.001), bias remained unaffected. Moreover, skewness and spatial dependence interactions affected both MSE and bias. Despite this, BME proved robust to sample size and skewness, demonstrating a negligible MSE on the graphical plot (heatmap).

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
International Fertilizer Development Center (US), Université d'Abomey-Calavi (BJ)
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Climate variability and models
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.