Automated face recognition assists with low‐prevalence face identity mismatches but can bias users

We present three experiments to study the effects of giving information about the decision of an automated face recognition (AFR) system to participants attempting to decide whether two face images show the same person. We make three contributions designed to make our results applicable to real-word use: participants are given the true response of a highly accurate AFR system; the face set reflects the mixed ethnicity of the city of London from where participants are drawn; and there are only 10% of mismatches. Participants were equally accurate when given the similarity score of the AFR system or just the binary decision but shifted their bias towards match and were over-confident on difficult pairs when given only binary information. No participants achieved the 100% accuracy of the AFR system, and they had only weak insight about their own performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Psychology
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12745
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated face recognition assists with low‐prevalence face identity mismatches but can bias users

E. CUNNINGHAM, Peter Hancock, Daniel J. Carragher, R.J. Watt et al.
8 citations
British Journal of Psychology
Face Recognition and Perception
2.74
article

Automated face recognition assists with low‐prevalence face identity mismatches but can bias users

E. CUNNINGHAM, Peter Hancock, Daniel J. Carragher, R.J. Watt, Anna K. Bobak, Marvin R. Mueller
article en
8 citations

Abstract

We present three experiments to study the effects of giving information about the decision of an automated face recognition (AFR) system to participants attempting to decide whether two face images show the same person. We make three contributions designed to make our results applicable to real-word use: participants are given the true response of a highly accurate AFR system; the face set reflects the mixed ethnicity of the city of London from where participants are drawn; and there are only 10% of mismatches. Participants were equally accurate when given the similarity score of the AFR system or just the binary decision but shifted their bias towards match and were over-confident on difficult pairs when given only binary information. No participants achieved the 100% accuracy of the AFR system, and they had only weak insight about their own performance.

British Journal of Psychology
University of Stirling (GB), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Experimental Psychology Society
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Face Recognition and Perception
2.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Automated face recognition assists with low‐prevalence face identity mismatches but can bias users — E. CUNNINGHAM, Peter Hancock, et al. · British Journal of Psychology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS