Comparative Evaluation of Microscopy, Rapid Diagnostic Tests, and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for Malaria Diagnosis in Nigerian Children

Background Malaria, a persistent public health issue in Nigeria, particularly among children, is often complicated by misdiagnosis, hindering effective treatment and control. The global adoption of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria has significantly improved management. This study, therefore, compares the diagnostic performance of microscopy, RDT, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Plasmodium falciparum detection in children in Kano state, Nigeria, providing crucial insights for effective control and elimination. Methods Capillary blood samples and dried blood spots (DBS) were collected from 200 febrile children in a selected health center in Kano and systematically tested using RDT, microscopy, and nested polymerase PCR. The sensitivity and specificity for each diagnostic method were calculated, with nested PCR as the reference to assess diagnostic accuracy. Structured questionnaires were used to obtain information on possible risk factors. Data were analyzed using univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analysis, with p<0.05 considered significant. Results Out of the 200 children enrolled in the study, 112 (56%) tested positive by microscopy, 60 (30%) by RDT, and 70 (35%) by PCR. Using PCR (n=70) as the reference test, microscopy demonstrated a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 53%, while the RDT exhibited a lower sensitivity of 27% but a higher specificity of 68%. False positivity rates of 22 (31.5%) for RDT and 33 (46.9%) for microscopy were observed. Regarding false negatives, RDT had a much higher rate of 51 (72.9%) than microscopy of 19 (27.1%). Conclusion The study divulges the limitations of RDT in malaria detection, particularly its low sensitivity. With its higher sensitivity, microscopy also showed a significant false-positive rate. The study suggests a practical solution combining RDT and microscopy for routine malaria diagnosis, which could significantly improve diagnostic accuracy. More ongoing research is needed to develop more suitable RDTs for routine malaria diagnosis in endemic communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.73739
Primary Topic
Malaria Research and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Microscopy, Rapid Diagnostic Tests, and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for Malaria Diagnosis in Nigerian Children

Salma A.R. Suliman, Bolaji N. Thomas, Olusola Ojurongbe, Adedolapo B. Olorunfemi et al.
Cureus
Malaria Research and Control
article

Comparative Evaluation of Microscopy, Rapid Diagnostic Tests, and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for Malaria Diagnosis in Nigerian Children

Salma A.R. Suliman, Bolaji N. Thomas, Olusola Ojurongbe, Adedolapo B. Olorunfemi, Amina Ahmed, Oyindamola G Osun
article en

Abstract

Background Malaria, a persistent public health issue in Nigeria, particularly among children, is often complicated by misdiagnosis, hindering effective treatment and control. The global adoption of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria has significantly improved management. This study, therefore, compares the diagnostic performance of microscopy, RDT, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Plasmodium falciparum detection in children in Kano state, Nigeria, providing crucial insights for effective control and elimination. Methods Capillary blood samples and dried blood spots (DBS) were collected from 200 febrile children in a selected health center in Kano and systematically tested using RDT, microscopy, and nested polymerase PCR. The sensitivity and specificity for each diagnostic method were calculated, with nested PCR as the reference to assess diagnostic accuracy. Structured questionnaires were used to obtain information on possible risk factors. Data were analyzed using univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analysis, with p<0.05 considered significant. Results Out of the 200 children enrolled in the study, 112 (56%) tested positive by microscopy, 60 (30%) by RDT, and 70 (35%) by PCR. Using PCR (n=70) as the reference test, microscopy demonstrated a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 53%, while the RDT exhibited a lower sensitivity of 27% but a higher specificity of 68%. False positivity rates of 22 (31.5%) for RDT and 33 (46.9%) for microscopy were observed. Regarding false negatives, RDT had a much higher rate of 51 (72.9%) than microscopy of 19 (27.1%). Conclusion The study divulges the limitations of RDT in malaria detection, particularly its low sensitivity. With its higher sensitivity, microscopy also showed a significant false-positive rate. The study suggests a practical solution combining RDT and microscopy for routine malaria diagnosis, which could significantly improve diagnostic accuracy. More ongoing research is needed to develop more suitable RDTs for routine malaria diagnosis in endemic communities.

CureusVol. 16(11)
Kaneka (United States) (US), University of Khartoum (SD), Rochester Institute of Technology (US), Ladoke Akintola University of Technology (NG)
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Malaria Research and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.