High chromosomal instability is associated with higher 10‐year risks of recurrence for hormone receptor‐positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐negative breast cancer patients: clinical evidence from a large‐scale, multiple‐site, retrospec

Long-term survival varies among hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer patients and is seriously impaired by metastasis. Chromosomal instability (CIN) was one of the key drivers of breast cancer metastasis. Here we evaluate CIN and 10-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and overall survival (OS) in HR+/HER2-- breast cancer. In this large-scale, multiple-site, retrospective study, 354 HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients were recruited. Of these, 204 patients were used for internal training, 70 for external validation, and 80 for cross-validation. All medical records were carefully reviewed to obtain the disease recurrence information. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples were collected, followed by low-pass whole-genome sequencing with a median genome coverage of 1.86X using minimal 1 ng DNA input. CIN was then assessed using a customized bioinformatics workflow. Three or more instances of CIN per sample was defined as high CIN and the frequency was 42.2% (86/204) in the internal cohort. High CIN correlated significantly with increased lymph node metastasis, vascular invasion, progesterone receptor negative status, HER2 low, worse pathological type, and performed as an independent prognostic factor for HR+/- breast cancer. Patients with high CIN had shorter iDFS and OS than those with low CIN [10-year iDFS 11.1% versus 82.2%, hazard ratio (HR) = 11.12, p < 0.01; 10-year OS 45.7% versus 94.3%, HR = 14.17, p < 0.01]. These findings were validated in two external cohorts with 70 breast cancer patients. Moreover, high CIN could predict the prognosis more accurately than Adjuvant! Online score (10-year iDFS 11.1% versus 48.6%, HR = 2.71, p < 0.01). Cross-validation analysis found that high consistency (83.8%) was observed between CIN and MammaPrint score, while only 45% between CIN and Adjuvant! Online score. In conclusion, high CIN is an independent prognostic indicator for HR+/HER2- breast cancer with shorter iDFS and OS and holds promise for predicting recurrence and metastasis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/2056-4538.70011
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High chromosomal instability is associated with higher 10‐year risks of recurrence for hormone receptor‐positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐negative breast cancer patients: clinical evidence from a large‐scale, multiple‐site, retrospec

Liang Zhu, Jiani Pan, Jianfei Fu, Xiang Lu et al.
1 citations
The Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
0.29
article

High chromosomal instability is associated with higher 10‐year risks of recurrence for hormone receptor‐positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐negative breast cancer patients: clinical evidence from a large‐scale, multiple‐site, retrospec

Liang Zhu, Jiani Pan, Jianfei Fu, Xiang Lu, Wen‐Ming Cao, Pu‐Chun Li, Yu‐Yang Liao, Xiaolin Li, Qiao‐Yan Zhu, Ziliang Qian, Wenyong Sun, Xiaojia Wang, Yang Yu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Long-term survival varies among hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer patients and is seriously impaired by metastasis. Chromosomal instability (CIN) was one of the key drivers of breast cancer metastasis. Here we evaluate CIN and 10-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and overall survival (OS) in HR+/HER2-- breast cancer. In this large-scale, multiple-site, retrospective study, 354 HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients were recruited. Of these, 204 patients were used for internal training, 70 for external validation, and 80 for cross-validation. All medical records were carefully reviewed to obtain the disease recurrence information. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples were collected, followed by low-pass whole-genome sequencing with a median genome coverage of 1.86X using minimal 1 ng DNA input. CIN was then assessed using a customized bioinformatics workflow. Three or more instances of CIN per sample was defined as high CIN and the frequency was 42.2% (86/204) in the internal cohort. High CIN correlated significantly with increased lymph node metastasis, vascular invasion, progesterone receptor negative status, HER2 low, worse pathological type, and performed as an independent prognostic factor for HR+/- breast cancer. Patients with high CIN had shorter iDFS and OS than those with low CIN [10-year iDFS 11.1% versus 82.2%, hazard ratio (HR) = 11.12, p < 0.01; 10-year OS 45.7% versus 94.3%, HR = 14.17, p < 0.01]. These findings were validated in two external cohorts with 70 breast cancer patients. Moreover, high CIN could predict the prognosis more accurately than Adjuvant! Online score (10-year iDFS 11.1% versus 48.6%, HR = 2.71, p < 0.01). Cross-validation analysis found that high consistency (83.8%) was observed between CIN and MammaPrint score, while only 45% between CIN and Adjuvant! Online score. In conclusion, high CIN is an independent prognostic indicator for HR+/HER2- breast cancer with shorter iDFS and OS and holds promise for predicting recurrence and metastasis.

The Journal of Pathology Clinical ResearchVol. 10(6)
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN), Wenzhou Medical University (CN), Jiaxing University (CN), Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (CN), First Hospital of Jiaxing (CN), Jinhua Central Hospital (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
0.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.