Feature versus object in interpreting working memory capacity

The debate about whether the capacity of working memory (WM) varies with the complexity of memory items continues. This study employed novel experimental materials to investigate the role of complexity in WM capacity. Across seven experiments, we explored the relationship between complexity and WM capacity. The results indicated that the complexity of memory items significantly affects WM capacity. However, given the non-linear relationship between complexity and WM capacity, we propose that WM may not allocate resources directly to each individual item. Instead, it might integrate these items to some extent before storage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Science of Learning
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00279-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feature versus object in interpreting working memory capacity

Wuji Lin, Jiejie Liao, Jingyuan Lin, Yutong Liu et al.
1 citations
npj Science of Learning
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
0.34
article

Feature versus object in interpreting working memory capacity

Wuji Lin, Jiejie Liao, Jingyuan Lin, Yutong Liu, Yuan Hu, Chenxi Lv
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The debate about whether the capacity of working memory (WM) varies with the complexity of memory items continues. This study employed novel experimental materials to investigate the role of complexity in WM capacity. Across seven experiments, we explored the relationship between complexity and WM capacity. The results indicated that the complexity of memory items significantly affects WM capacity. However, given the non-linear relationship between complexity and WM capacity, we propose that WM may not allocate resources directly to each individual item. Instead, it might integrate these items to some extent before storage.

npj Science of LearningVol. 9(1)
South China Normal University (CN), Sichuan Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Feature versus object in interpreting working memory capacity — Wuji Lin, Jiejie Liao, et al. · npj Science of Learning (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS