Assessment of air dose distribution in the vertical plane for better occupational exposure management

The International Commission on Radiological Protection recommended a significant reduction of the equivalent dose limit for the eye lens. Reportedly, medical staff in charge of diagnostic imaging procedures may exceed the new dose limits for the eye lens. The use of dosimeters dedicated to the eye lens remains low, and dosimeters for the neck region were often used to assess eye lens doses. However, measurements by neck badges may overestimate or underestimate the recommended eye lens doses because the height of the neck differs from that of the eye. This study aimed to evaluate the air dose distribution in the vertical plane to understand the difference between neck and eye doses. H*(10) in the height of the eye position was 52.8% lower than that in the height of the neck position in the under-table position. Thus, the equivalent eye lens dose evaluated using a neck badge dosimeter may be overestimated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncae150
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of air dose distribution in the vertical plane for better occupational exposure management

Shota Hosokawa, Tomuhiro Noro, Minoru Osanai, Maiko Kitajima et al.
1 citations
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Radiation Dose and Imaging
0.40
article

Assessment of air dose distribution in the vertical plane for better occupational exposure management

Shota Hosokawa, Tomuhiro Noro, Minoru Osanai, Maiko Kitajima, Megumi Tsushima, Kohsei Kudo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The International Commission on Radiological Protection recommended a significant reduction of the equivalent dose limit for the eye lens. Reportedly, medical staff in charge of diagnostic imaging procedures may exceed the new dose limits for the eye lens. The use of dosimeters dedicated to the eye lens remains low, and dosimeters for the neck region were often used to assess eye lens doses. However, measurements by neck badges may overestimate or underestimate the recommended eye lens doses because the height of the neck differs from that of the eye. This study aimed to evaluate the air dose distribution in the vertical plane to understand the difference between neck and eye doses. H*(10) in the height of the eye position was 52.8% lower than that in the height of the neck position in the under-table position. Thus, the equivalent eye lens dose evaluated using a neck badge dosimeter may be overestimated.

Radiation Protection DosimetryVol. 200(16-18)
Hirosaki University (JP)
Hirosaki University, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.