Break the Eclectic Choice: Can Green Credit Policy Restraint the Polluting Firms’ Financialization? Evidence From China

The innovative use of green credit policy for financial regulation in environmental governance is a significant effort to balance environmental preservation and economic growth. The objective of this paper is to study the effect of green credit on the polluting firms’ eclectic business strategy, which is financialization, and the related mechanisms. Based on the sample of Chinese public firms from 2008 to 2019, we employ the DID model constructed by the Green Credit Guidelines promulgated in 2012 to investigate the causality between green credit policy and firms’ financialization. The results of theoretical and empirical studies show that the green credit policy helps to mitigate the financialization of heavy polluters compared to non-heavily polluting firms, thereby realizing the optimal allocation of financial resources. The mechanism test indicates that green credit policy has a suppressive effect on the financialization level of heavily polluting firms, mainly through promoting green innovation while reducing excess cash and banks’ credit willingness. The heterogeneity test further indicates that green credit policy is more pronounced in SOEs, strong environmental regulation enforcement regions and higher market competition industries. Our study confirms the effectiveness of green credit policies from the perspective of firms’ business strategy, which not only provides empirical evidence for the evaluation of green credit policy effects, but also sheds lights on the green transformation and sustainable development of heavily polluting firms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241288063
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Break the Eclectic Choice: Can Green Credit Policy Restraint the Polluting Firms’ Financialization? Evidence From China

Xi Gu, Sijia Qiao
1 citations
SAGE Open
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
0.54
article

Break the Eclectic Choice: Can Green Credit Policy Restraint the Polluting Firms’ Financialization? Evidence From China

Xi Gu, Sijia Qiao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The innovative use of green credit policy for financial regulation in environmental governance is a significant effort to balance environmental preservation and economic growth. The objective of this paper is to study the effect of green credit on the polluting firms’ eclectic business strategy, which is financialization, and the related mechanisms. Based on the sample of Chinese public firms from 2008 to 2019, we employ the DID model constructed by the Green Credit Guidelines promulgated in 2012 to investigate the causality between green credit policy and firms’ financialization. The results of theoretical and empirical studies show that the green credit policy helps to mitigate the financialization of heavy polluters compared to non-heavily polluting firms, thereby realizing the optimal allocation of financial resources. The mechanism test indicates that green credit policy has a suppressive effect on the financialization level of heavily polluting firms, mainly through promoting green innovation while reducing excess cash and banks’ credit willingness. The heterogeneity test further indicates that green credit policy is more pronounced in SOEs, strong environmental regulation enforcement regions and higher market competition industries. Our study confirms the effectiveness of green credit policies from the perspective of firms’ business strategy, which not only provides empirical evidence for the evaluation of green credit policy effects, but also sheds lights on the green transformation and sustainable development of heavily polluting firms.

SAGE OpenVol. 14(4)
Shanghai National Accounting Institute (CN), Shanghai Maritime University (CN)
Shanghai Office of Philosophy and Social Science, National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Break the Eclectic Choice: Can Green Credit Policy Restraint the Polluting Firms’ Financialization? Evidence From China — Xi Gu, Sijia Qiao · SAGE Open (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS