Abstract 4146217: Validation of an Unsupervised Cluster Model of Clinical and Echocardiographic characteristics for Natural Unbiased Stratification of Risk In Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background: We previously reported computational clustering to describe clinically distinct phenotypes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We aimed to validate our prior model exploring the clinical and echocardiographic variations in HFpEF on unseen dataset. Methods: Retrospectively, 556 HFpEF patients previously reported [exploration group, Age: 66±17years , 56%females, EF: 63±6%, DOI:10.1016/s0735-1097(19)31580-3] and a new unseen dataset of 1055 HFpEF patients [validation group, Age: 58±17years , 56% females, EF: 60±6%] were studied and followed for a median of 4.7 years for death and cardiac hospitalization. A 2-step unsupervised cluster model previously applied to the exploratory group and composed of 11 echo and clinical variables (age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, hematocrit, creatinine, pulmonary functions, E/A ratio, E/e’ ratio, left atrial volume index, tricuspid regurgitation velocity) was saved and applied to the unseen validation dataset. Clusters were described based on echo and clinical domains. Results: The analysis in the exploratory group yielded 8 different clusters with increasing distinct clinical, structural, hemodynamic, as well as adverse event risks as previously reported [low risk females (lowest risk), low risk males, hypertensive females, hypertensive males, multiple risk factor group, diabetes group, pulmonary group, and renal group (highest risk), figure 1 A,B,C]. When applied to the exploratory group, similar clinical, echocardiographic and event rate risk criteria were noted (figure 1 D,E,F). The diagnostic performance of both exploratory and validation models were comparable (AUC=0.724, 0.721, respectively). In the validation group, the clusters also differentiated brain natriuretic peptide and troponin concentration and had progressively worsening H2FPEF score, exercise capacity and exercise induced diastolic dysfunction. Conclusion: The current study validates our previous model and confirms the previously reported heterogeneous clinical and echocardiographic phenotypes. Next, computational models such as the one reported should be applied to clinical trials to discover new therapeutic approaches unique to each phenotype.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4146217
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4146217: Validation of an Unsupervised Cluster Model of Clinical and Echocardiographic characteristics for Natural Unbiased Stratification of Risk In Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Alaa Mabrouk Salem Omar, Loba Alam, Sean Pinney, Edgar Argulian et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4146217: Validation of an Unsupervised Cluster Model of Clinical and Echocardiographic characteristics for Natural Unbiased Stratification of Risk In Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Alaa Mabrouk Salem Omar, Loba Alam, Sean Pinney, Edgar Argulian, Ga Hee Kim, Juan José Arango
article en

Abstract

Background: We previously reported computational clustering to describe clinically distinct phenotypes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We aimed to validate our prior model exploring the clinical and echocardiographic variations in HFpEF on unseen dataset. Methods: Retrospectively, 556 HFpEF patients previously reported [exploration group, Age: 66±17years , 56%females, EF: 63±6%, DOI:10.1016/s0735-1097(19)31580-3] and a new unseen dataset of 1055 HFpEF patients [validation group, Age: 58±17years , 56% females, EF: 60±6%] were studied and followed for a median of 4.7 years for death and cardiac hospitalization. A 2-step unsupervised cluster model previously applied to the exploratory group and composed of 11 echo and clinical variables (age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, hematocrit, creatinine, pulmonary functions, E/A ratio, E/e’ ratio, left atrial volume index, tricuspid regurgitation velocity) was saved and applied to the unseen validation dataset. Clusters were described based on echo and clinical domains. Results: The analysis in the exploratory group yielded 8 different clusters with increasing distinct clinical, structural, hemodynamic, as well as adverse event risks as previously reported [low risk females (lowest risk), low risk males, hypertensive females, hypertensive males, multiple risk factor group, diabetes group, pulmonary group, and renal group (highest risk), figure 1 A,B,C]. When applied to the exploratory group, similar clinical, echocardiographic and event rate risk criteria were noted (figure 1 D,E,F). The diagnostic performance of both exploratory and validation models were comparable (AUC=0.724, 0.721, respectively). In the validation group, the clusters also differentiated brain natriuretic peptide and troponin concentration and had progressively worsening H2FPEF score, exercise capacity and exercise induced diastolic dysfunction. Conclusion: The current study validates our previous model and confirms the previously reported heterogeneous clinical and echocardiographic phenotypes. Next, computational models such as the one reported should be applied to clinical trials to discover new therapeutic approaches unique to each phenotype.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Bridgeport Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.