Abstract 4145340: Health System Variability in Lipid Management for Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: An Analysis from Cv-MOBIUS
Background: Nationally, many ASCVD patients fail to achieve an LDL-C <70 mg/dL, and uptake of both statin and non-statin therapies is low. The degree to which this varies across health systems is less clear. Methods: A cross sectional analysis was performed where lipid levels and lipid lowering therapies (LLT) were assessed using electronic health record data in patients with a previous diagnosis of ASCVD. The data was obtained across 14 US healthcare systems between 1/1/2021-12/31/2022. Proportions of patients with an active prescription of any statin, high intensity statin, ezetimibe, PCSK9i, and combination therapy (two or more agents) within 395 days of the most recent LDL-C value (index date) was evaluated overall and by participating site. Additionally, the proportion of patients with an LDL-C <70 mg/dL at the index date was also assessed. Results: Across 14 health systems, 1,118,623 patients with ASCVD were identified (median 61,840 per health system, range 8,161-182,315). Overall, 675,776 (60.4%) had an LDL-C level in the past year (range 39.1% - 70.8%). Of those with a lipid level, achievement of LDL-C <70 mg/dL ranged from 34.6-47.2%. In total, 42.6% were on any statin, 20.1% were on a high intensity statin, 4.3% on ezetimibe, and 1.2% on a PCSK9i. Only 2.9% were on combination therapy of a statin with ezetimibe or a PCSK9i. Variability was seen across health systems in utilization of each of these therapies, however even in the highest performing health systems, LLT uptake and achievement of LDL-C < 70mg/dL remained low ( Figure). Conclusion: Variability in utilization of LLT in ASCVD patients between health systems suggests that system-level factors may impact achieving guideline-based LDL-C goals. Despite the variability, the highest proportion of patients achieving an LDL-C <70mg/dL remained under 50% indicating the need for aggressive implementation efforts.
Authors
- Bethany Kalich (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1220-3484)
- Peter Shrader
- Seth S. Martin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7021-7622)
- Nafeesa N Dhalwani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3204-1328)
- Monika Leja
- Laney K. Jones (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6182-5634)
- Michael D. Shapiro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9071-3287)
- H. Lester Kirchner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2557-6749)
- Mark B. Effron (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4050-5030)
- Satoshi Shoji (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2223-7215)
- Alanna M. Chamberlain (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1888-9584)
- Elizabeth A. Chrischilles (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1843-1955)
- Ann Marie Návar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6197-9860)
- Nishant Shah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2666-7132)
- Cezary Wójcik (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2509-7251)
- Eric David Peterson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5415-4721)
- Clint Allred
- Jonathan Arnold (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1185-555X)
- Zahid Ahmad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3070-7852)
- Elisa L. Priest (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0474-6275)
- Mahanaz Syed
- Soledad Fernández
Institutions
- University of Iowa (US)
- Geisinger Medical Center (US)
- Amgen (United States) (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Saint Luke's Health System (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Keio University (JP)
- Ochsner Medical Center (US)
- Audie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital (US)
- Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Michigan United (US)
- Amgen (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- UPMC McKeesport (US)
- Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Wake Forest University (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Circulation
- Published
- 2024-11-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4145340
- Primary Topic
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00