Abstract 4145626: Comparative Bleeding Risks Following Acute Myocardial Infarction: Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor, with Consideration for Clopidogrel Resistance

Various studies have shown higher bleeding risks with ticagrelor in comparison to clopidogrel in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The literature also reveals significant variability in Clopidogrel resistance and consequent efficacy in patients. Our study compares the post-AMI bleeding risks and outcomes of patients on Clopidogrel with confirmed inhibition of platelet aggregation via P2Y12 platelet reactivity assay, compared to Ticagrelor. We queried the TriNeTX Global collaborative network for adults diagnosed with AMI between 01/01/08 to 12/31/23 and created two cohorts: one on Clopidogrel for at least one month post-AMI, after confirmed ADP-mediated P2Y12 inhibitor effect, and the second cohort was on Ticagrelor for at least one month post-AMI. We conducted propensity score matching(PSM) for around 35 variables, including race, age, sex, medications, and other comorbidities. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) at one year. Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke at one year were the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included 4-point major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, cardiac arrest, heart failure, and ischemic stroke. The sample population had 1,460 post-AMI patients in the Clopidogrel cohort (Cohort 1) and 17,686 post-AMI patients on Ticagrelor (Cohort 2). After PSM both cohorts had 1,296 patients. The Clopidogrel cohort had significantly increased odds of upper GI bleeding (OR 1.656, 95% CI, 1.092-2.511) and hemorrhagic stroke (OR 2.119, 95% CI, 1.110 - 4.044) compared to Cohort 2 at one year. Among secondary outcomes, there was increased odds of heart failure (OR 1.565, 95%CI, 1.118-2.190), ischemic stroke (OR 1.745, 95%CI, 1.098 - 2.775), and 4-point MACCE (OR 1.549, 95%CI, 1.110 - 2.160) in the clopidogrel group compared to ticagrelor. There was no significance noticed in cardiac arrest and all cause-mortality. In our study, post-AMI patients on Clopidogrel with confirmed in-vitro platelet aggregation effect had significantly higher odds of bleeding and MACCE than those on Ticagrelor. However, Ticagrelor use did not show any mortality benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4145626
Primary Topic
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4145626: Comparative Bleeding Risks Following Acute Myocardial Infarction: Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor, with Consideration for Clopidogrel Resistance

Avi Harisingani, Debanik Chaudhuri, Anderson Anuforo, Rohan Kumar Ochani et al.
Circulation
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
article

Abstract 4145626: Comparative Bleeding Risks Following Acute Myocardial Infarction: Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor, with Consideration for Clopidogrel Resistance

Avi Harisingani, Debanik Chaudhuri, Anderson Anuforo, Rohan Kumar Ochani, Pratyaksh Vaishnav, Nikita Gupta, Sahana Devakumar
article en

Abstract

Various studies have shown higher bleeding risks with ticagrelor in comparison to clopidogrel in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The literature also reveals significant variability in Clopidogrel resistance and consequent efficacy in patients. Our study compares the post-AMI bleeding risks and outcomes of patients on Clopidogrel with confirmed inhibition of platelet aggregation via P2Y12 platelet reactivity assay, compared to Ticagrelor. We queried the TriNeTX Global collaborative network for adults diagnosed with AMI between 01/01/08 to 12/31/23 and created two cohorts: one on Clopidogrel for at least one month post-AMI, after confirmed ADP-mediated P2Y12 inhibitor effect, and the second cohort was on Ticagrelor for at least one month post-AMI. We conducted propensity score matching(PSM) for around 35 variables, including race, age, sex, medications, and other comorbidities. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) at one year. Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke at one year were the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included 4-point major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, cardiac arrest, heart failure, and ischemic stroke. The sample population had 1,460 post-AMI patients in the Clopidogrel cohort (Cohort 1) and 17,686 post-AMI patients on Ticagrelor (Cohort 2). After PSM both cohorts had 1,296 patients. The Clopidogrel cohort had significantly increased odds of upper GI bleeding (OR 1.656, 95% CI, 1.092-2.511) and hemorrhagic stroke (OR 2.119, 95% CI, 1.110 - 4.044) compared to Cohort 2 at one year. Among secondary outcomes, there was increased odds of heart failure (OR 1.565, 95%CI, 1.118-2.190), ischemic stroke (OR 1.745, 95%CI, 1.098 - 2.775), and 4-point MACCE (OR 1.549, 95%CI, 1.110 - 2.160) in the clopidogrel group compared to ticagrelor. There was no significance noticed in cardiac arrest and all cause-mortality. In our study, post-AMI patients on Clopidogrel with confirmed in-vitro platelet aggregation effect had significantly higher odds of bleeding and MACCE than those on Ticagrelor. However, Ticagrelor use did not show any mortality benefit.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
SUNY Upstate Medical University (US), MacNeal Hospital (US), Loyola Medicine (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.