Abstract 4146377: Association of Socioeconomic Disadvantage with Coronary Artery Disease on Coronary CTA and Subsequent Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: The Mass General Brigham CCTA Registry

Background: Socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with worse CV outcomes. However, whether living in a disadvantaged neighborhood is associated with both the presence of coronary plaque identified by Coronary CTA (CCTA) and subsequent MACE is not well defined. Aims: To assess whether residence in a disadvantaged neighborhood predicts (1) plaque presence and stenosis severity and (2) long-term MACE after adjusting for plaque burden. Methods: We included patients who underwent clinically indicated CCTA from 2006 to 2021. Home addresses were geocoded and mapped to their census block groups. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used to assess neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage from 1 to 10. Based on ADI, patients were grouped into low (1-2), medium (3-5), and high neighborhood deprivation (6-10). The presence of plaque (present vs absent) and severity (no plaque or stenosis [0%], nonobstructive [1-49% stenosis], and obstructive [≥50% stenosis]) were categorized on CCTA. We used logistic regression to assess the association of plaque burden and ADI, and Cox regression to assess the association of ADI and MACE, adjusting for CAD severity and risk factors. Results: We included 26,165 patients with a median age of 58 years (IQR 49-67). Of these, 44.5% were female, and 57.8%, 52.8%, and 16.7% had a history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes, respectively. The median follow-up after CCTA was 3.9 years (IQR 1.7-7.4). Living in highly disadvantaged neighborhoods was significantly associated with presence of plaque (OR 1.20 [95% CI 1.11-1.30] p<0.001) and obstructive stenosis (OR 1.20 [95% CI 1.11-1.30] p<0.001). Over follow-up, individuals living in medium ADI neighborhoods had a 16% increased hazard of MACE [adjusted HR 1.16 (95% CI 1.02-1.31) p=0.019], and those living in highly disadvantaged neighborhoods had a 20% increased hazard of MACE [adjusted HR 1.20 (95% CI 1.05-1.37) p=0.007] compared to individuals living in the most advantaged neighborhoods. Conclusion: Residence in medium and highly disadvantaged neighborhoods was associated with an increased prevalence of plaque and obstructive stenosis on CCTA as well as higher rates of MACE, even after adjusting for traditional CV risk factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4146377
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4146377: Association of Socioeconomic Disadvantage with Coronary Artery Disease on Coronary CTA and Subsequent Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: The Mass General Brigham CCTA Registry

David Biery, Jon Hainer, Ron Blankstein, Camila Verônica Souza Freire et al.
1 citations
Circulation
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
0.40
article

Abstract 4146377: Association of Socioeconomic Disadvantage with Coronary Artery Disease on Coronary CTA and Subsequent Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: The Mass General Brigham CCTA Registry

David Biery, Jon Hainer, Ron Blankstein, Camila Verônica Souza Freire, Arthur Shiyovich, Daniel Huck, Michael L. Steigner, Sumit Gupta, Adam N. Berman, Ayaz Aghayev, Brittany Weber, Sandeep Hedgire, Stephanie A. Besser, Michael T. Lu, Brian Ghoshhajra, Rhanderson Cardoso, Marcelo F. Di Carli, Jun Miao, Cian P. McCarthy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with worse CV outcomes. However, whether living in a disadvantaged neighborhood is associated with both the presence of coronary plaque identified by Coronary CTA (CCTA) and subsequent MACE is not well defined. Aims: To assess whether residence in a disadvantaged neighborhood predicts (1) plaque presence and stenosis severity and (2) long-term MACE after adjusting for plaque burden. Methods: We included patients who underwent clinically indicated CCTA from 2006 to 2021. Home addresses were geocoded and mapped to their census block groups. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used to assess neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage from 1 to 10. Based on ADI, patients were grouped into low (1-2), medium (3-5), and high neighborhood deprivation (6-10). The presence of plaque (present vs absent) and severity (no plaque or stenosis [0%], nonobstructive [1-49% stenosis], and obstructive [≥50% stenosis]) were categorized on CCTA. We used logistic regression to assess the association of plaque burden and ADI, and Cox regression to assess the association of ADI and MACE, adjusting for CAD severity and risk factors. Results: We included 26,165 patients with a median age of 58 years (IQR 49-67). Of these, 44.5% were female, and 57.8%, 52.8%, and 16.7% had a history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes, respectively. The median follow-up after CCTA was 3.9 years (IQR 1.7-7.4). Living in highly disadvantaged neighborhoods was significantly associated with presence of plaque (OR 1.20 [95% CI 1.11-1.30] p<0.001) and obstructive stenosis (OR 1.20 [95% CI 1.11-1.30] p<0.001). Over follow-up, individuals living in medium ADI neighborhoods had a 16% increased hazard of MACE [adjusted HR 1.16 (95% CI 1.02-1.31) p=0.019], and those living in highly disadvantaged neighborhoods had a 20% increased hazard of MACE [adjusted HR 1.20 (95% CI 1.05-1.37) p=0.007] compared to individuals living in the most advantaged neighborhoods. Conclusion: Residence in medium and highly disadvantaged neighborhoods was associated with an increased prevalence of plaque and obstructive stenosis on CCTA as well as higher rates of MACE, even after adjusting for traditional CV risk factors.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Winchester Hospital (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.