Abstract 4146361: Patients demonstrate hesitancy to participate in cognitive assessments in an international coronary bypass surgery graft (CABG) surgery trial

Introduction: Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) is the most common cardiac surgery in adults, yet it is associated with a range of complications including stroke, cognitive impairment, and dementia. Despite the critical importance of cognitive outcomes, cognition remains understudied in CABG surgery trials, and recruitment for cardiac-related cognitive studies faces substantial challenges. Objective: Identify barriers to recruitment in a cognitive auxiliary study in the international Randomized Comparison Of The Clinical Outcome Of Single Vs Multiple Arterial Grafts (ROMA) trial. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with research staff (n=12) involved in the ROMA trial to explore themes related to recruitment barriers into ROMA:Cognition. The average interview length was approximately 25 minutes. Qualitative data were analyzed using a directed content analysis approach, and inter-rater reliability was assessed with Cohen's kappa score based on the five most frequently applied codes. Results: Twelve participants were recruited, with a mean age of 48 years. Of these, 90% were female, 60% were from North America, and 30% were from Europe. Key themes identified included: (1) misconceptions of cognition as equivalent to psychiatric disorders, (2) gaps in understanding the importance of measuring cognition for a cardiac-related study, (3) distrust in international data sharing practices, and (4) stigma and apprehension surrounding cognitive decline and mental health issues (Table 1). Conclusion: Educational interventions are crucial to improve patient understanding of the importance of cognitive assessments in the context of cardiac surgery. Addressing misconceptions and reducing stigma related to cognitive testing can enhance patient recruitment and engagement in cognitive auxiliary studies. Emphasizing the brain-heart connection and distinguishing cognitive assessment from psychiatric evaluation are essential steps to ensure comprehensive postoperative care and improve outcomes for CABG patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4146361
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4146361: Patients demonstrate hesitancy to participate in cognitive assessments in an international coronary bypass surgery graft (CABG) surgery trial

Ruth Masterson Creber, Sergio Rivera, Sarah Eslami, Richard H. Swartz
Circulation
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Abstract 4146361: Patients demonstrate hesitancy to participate in cognitive assessments in an international coronary bypass surgery graft (CABG) surgery trial

Ruth Masterson Creber, Sergio Rivera, Sarah Eslami, Richard H. Swartz
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) is the most common cardiac surgery in adults, yet it is associated with a range of complications including stroke, cognitive impairment, and dementia. Despite the critical importance of cognitive outcomes, cognition remains understudied in CABG surgery trials, and recruitment for cardiac-related cognitive studies faces substantial challenges. Objective: Identify barriers to recruitment in a cognitive auxiliary study in the international Randomized Comparison Of The Clinical Outcome Of Single Vs Multiple Arterial Grafts (ROMA) trial. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with research staff (n=12) involved in the ROMA trial to explore themes related to recruitment barriers into ROMA:Cognition. The average interview length was approximately 25 minutes. Qualitative data were analyzed using a directed content analysis approach, and inter-rater reliability was assessed with Cohen's kappa score based on the five most frequently applied codes. Results: Twelve participants were recruited, with a mean age of 48 years. Of these, 90% were female, 60% were from North America, and 30% were from Europe. Key themes identified included: (1) misconceptions of cognition as equivalent to psychiatric disorders, (2) gaps in understanding the importance of measuring cognition for a cardiac-related study, (3) distrust in international data sharing practices, and (4) stigma and apprehension surrounding cognitive decline and mental health issues (Table 1). Conclusion: Educational interventions are crucial to improve patient understanding of the importance of cognitive assessments in the context of cardiac surgery. Addressing misconceptions and reducing stigma related to cognitive testing can enhance patient recruitment and engagement in cognitive auxiliary studies. Emphasizing the brain-heart connection and distinguishing cognitive assessment from psychiatric evaluation are essential steps to ensure comprehensive postoperative care and improve outcomes for CABG patients.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.