Abstract 4145579: Comparing 1-Year and 3-Year Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Background: A major challenge in improving atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is understanding variability in patient’s response to ablation. While some are long-term responders, others recur within a month. Some of this variability may be attributed to progression of AF despite short-term success manifested by acute termination. Our objective was to use our rich clinical database to identify predictors of differential response to ablation. Method: We studied 597 consecutive patients with drug-refractory AF, enrolled prospectively for a uniform AF ablation strategy at Stanford Health. We applied logistic regression to 73 clinical variables to identify features associated with freedom from AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) at 1-3 years. Results: Patients (N=597) were 65.4±10.4 years, 29.0% female, BMI 29.6 kg/m2, 60.1% with non-paroxysmal AF, and 68.8% at de novo ablation. N=253 (42.4%) recurred at 1 year, N=101 (16.9%) within 1-3 years, and N=243 (40.7%) were free of AF beyond 36 months. One year success in adjusted analyses was associated with fatigue, prior ablation, PVI approach, beta-blocker usage, digoxin usage, and GDMT usage. AF progression at 3 years was associated in adjusted analyses with post-ablation asthma and post-ablation usage of direct oral anticoagulants. In addition, pre-ablation stroke and presenting rhythm was associated with both outcomes. Conclusion: In a large prospective AF registry, we identified features which differed between patients with 1-year success and 3-year success, as well as factors shared between endpoints. This data may provide mechanistic insights and help to guide and personalize ablation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4145579
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4145579: Comparing 1-Year and 3-Year Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Albert J. Rogers, Kelly Brennan, Paul Clopton, Ruibin Feng et al.
Circulation
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4145579: Comparing 1-Year and 3-Year Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Albert J. Rogers, Kelly Brennan, Paul Clopton, Ruibin Feng, Chad Brodt, Sanjiv M. Narayan, Tina Baykaner, Paul J. Wang, Brototo Deb, Viren Srivastava, Prasanth Ganesan, Hui Ju Chang
article en

Abstract

Background: A major challenge in improving atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is understanding variability in patient’s response to ablation. While some are long-term responders, others recur within a month. Some of this variability may be attributed to progression of AF despite short-term success manifested by acute termination. Our objective was to use our rich clinical database to identify predictors of differential response to ablation. Method: We studied 597 consecutive patients with drug-refractory AF, enrolled prospectively for a uniform AF ablation strategy at Stanford Health. We applied logistic regression to 73 clinical variables to identify features associated with freedom from AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) at 1-3 years. Results: Patients (N=597) were 65.4±10.4 years, 29.0% female, BMI 29.6 kg/m2, 60.1% with non-paroxysmal AF, and 68.8% at de novo ablation. N=253 (42.4%) recurred at 1 year, N=101 (16.9%) within 1-3 years, and N=243 (40.7%) were free of AF beyond 36 months. One year success in adjusted analyses was associated with fatigue, prior ablation, PVI approach, beta-blocker usage, digoxin usage, and GDMT usage. AF progression at 3 years was associated in adjusted analyses with post-ablation asthma and post-ablation usage of direct oral anticoagulants. In addition, pre-ablation stroke and presenting rhythm was associated with both outcomes. Conclusion: In a large prospective AF registry, we identified features which differed between patients with 1-year success and 3-year success, as well as factors shared between endpoints. This data may provide mechanistic insights and help to guide and personalize ablation.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Silicon Valley University (US), Stanford University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.