Abstract 4145745: Inter-hospital Transfer for Cardiogenic Shock patients: Contemporary Strategies and Outcomes

Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is often managed with strategies that require inter-hospital transfers. The contemporary practice patterns and outcomes of transferred CS are unknown. Methods: Patients with CS were identified using ICD-10 codes in Medicare claims from 2016-2021. We used a logistic regression model to assess the association of hospital transfer with mortality. We conducted a sensitivity analysis examining the association of early transfer (≤ 24 hours) versus later transfer (>24 hours) and mortality. Results: We identified 260,092 patients with CS; of which 9.7% required inter-hospital transfer. Mean time to transfer was 3.5 days (Figure). Transferring hospitals were smaller (229 versus 396 beds), less likely teaching hospitals (43% versus 70%), and more likely rural (7% versus 0.4%). Compared with patients with CS that were not transferred, transferred patients were were older (77 versus 75 years) and had comparable co-morbidity burdens (heart failure 71% versus 73%, diabetes 55% versus 55%). Transferred patients were more likely to receive PCI (21% versus 17%), CABG (18% versus 9%), and MCS, including intra-aortic balloon pumps (21% versus 11%) and percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (11% versus 5%). Transferred patients had longer hospital length of stay (17.8 versus 9.8 days) and ICU length of stay (9.7 days versus 5.6 days). Observed mortality for transferred versus not transferred patients with CS was 37.4% and 40.4% respectively. In addition, transferred patients were associated with a lower mortality (adjusted OR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.76 – 0.81). Early transfer was associated with a slightly lower mortality compared with later transfer (36% vs 38%; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Nearly 10% of older patients with CS are transferred to another hospital. Transferred patients were more likely to be treated with revascularization and MCS. Transfer of patients with CS was associated with a lower mortality, especially if the transfer is early within the first 24 hours.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4145745
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4145745: Inter-hospital Transfer for Cardiogenic Shock patients: Contemporary Strategies and Outcomes

Dhruv S. Kazi, Ajar Kochar, Eric A. Secemsky, Zaid Almarzooq et al.
Circulation
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Abstract 4145745: Inter-hospital Transfer for Cardiogenic Shock patients: Contemporary Strategies and Outcomes

Dhruv S. Kazi, Ajar Kochar, Eric A. Secemsky, Zaid Almarzooq, Robert W. Yeh, Liang Li, Yang Song
article en

Abstract

Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is often managed with strategies that require inter-hospital transfers. The contemporary practice patterns and outcomes of transferred CS are unknown. Methods: Patients with CS were identified using ICD-10 codes in Medicare claims from 2016-2021. We used a logistic regression model to assess the association of hospital transfer with mortality. We conducted a sensitivity analysis examining the association of early transfer (≤ 24 hours) versus later transfer (>24 hours) and mortality. Results: We identified 260,092 patients with CS; of which 9.7% required inter-hospital transfer. Mean time to transfer was 3.5 days (Figure). Transferring hospitals were smaller (229 versus 396 beds), less likely teaching hospitals (43% versus 70%), and more likely rural (7% versus 0.4%). Compared with patients with CS that were not transferred, transferred patients were were older (77 versus 75 years) and had comparable co-morbidity burdens (heart failure 71% versus 73%, diabetes 55% versus 55%). Transferred patients were more likely to receive PCI (21% versus 17%), CABG (18% versus 9%), and MCS, including intra-aortic balloon pumps (21% versus 11%) and percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (11% versus 5%). Transferred patients had longer hospital length of stay (17.8 versus 9.8 days) and ICU length of stay (9.7 days versus 5.6 days). Observed mortality for transferred versus not transferred patients with CS was 37.4% and 40.4% respectively. In addition, transferred patients were associated with a lower mortality (adjusted OR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.76 – 0.81). Early transfer was associated with a slightly lower mortality compared with later transfer (36% vs 38%; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Nearly 10% of older patients with CS are transferred to another hospital. Transferred patients were more likely to be treated with revascularization and MCS. Transfer of patients with CS was associated with a lower mortality, especially if the transfer is early within the first 24 hours.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Chestnut Hill College (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.