Abstract 4146405: Blood Volume Prediction Equations Do Not Precisely Estimate Blood Volume in Adults with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)

Background: In heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) expanded blood volume (BV) can result in significant hemodynamic stress that contributes to disease pathogenesis. Due to the lack of routine access to methods of BV measurement, clinicians typically rely on BV prediction equations. However, current prediction equations do not accurately or precisely estimate BV, or its components, in HFpEF. The aim of our analysis was to directly measure blood volume in adults with HFpEF and compare newly developed BV prediction equations (Oberholzer et al ., 2023) to previously validated equations (Nadler and Pearson). Methods: In 52 adults with HFpEF (65% female; age: 70±7 years; BMI: 38±7[GM1] kg/m 2 ) we assessed total hemoglobin mass via carbon monoxide rebreathing, enabling calculation of BV. We estimated BV with the Oberholzer simple (age, sex, height and body mass) and clinical (age, height, and lean mass) equations, as well as Nadler and Pearson equations. Data were compared via either paired or independent samples t-tests or a one-way ANOVA with values presented as mean [95% CI] or mean ± standard deviation. Results: Unlike the Oberholzer simple (-226 [-507 – 55] ml, P =0.113) equation, the Oberholzer clinical equation significantly underestimated measured BV (-513 [-807 – 219] ml, P =0.001); both of which were imprecise with large typical error values (TE; Simple: 11%; Clinical: 11%). Compared to the Oberholzer equations, the mean estimated-measured difference was greater with the Nadler ( P <0.001; TE=12%) and Pearson ( P <0.001; TE=11%) equations (Figure 1A). We observed greater accuracy and precision of all prediction equations for females compared to males (Figure 1B-C): Oberholzer simple ( P =0.070); Oberholzer clinical ( P =0.047); Nadler ( P <0.001); Pearson ( P <0.043). Conclusions: The Oberholzer simple equation yielded the most accurate and precise prediction of BV in adults with HFpEF, with greater accuracy and precision in females. However, all prediction equations remain imprecise with substantial error up to 11% and should therefore be used with caution. As such, there needs to be more widespread measurement of BV to refine prediction equations utilized in clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4146405
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4146405: Blood Volume Prediction Equations Do Not Precisely Estimate Blood Volume in Adults with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)

James P. MacNamara, Satyam Sarma, Denis J. Wakeham, Giorgio Manferdelli et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4146405: Blood Volume Prediction Equations Do Not Precisely Estimate Blood Volume in Adults with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)

James P. MacNamara, Satyam Sarma, Denis J. Wakeham, Giorgio Manferdelli, Mitchel Samels, Tiffany Brazile, Meera Sooda, Christopher M. Hearon, Michael Leahy, Benjamin D. Levine
article en

Abstract

Background: In heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) expanded blood volume (BV) can result in significant hemodynamic stress that contributes to disease pathogenesis. Due to the lack of routine access to methods of BV measurement, clinicians typically rely on BV prediction equations. However, current prediction equations do not accurately or precisely estimate BV, or its components, in HFpEF. The aim of our analysis was to directly measure blood volume in adults with HFpEF and compare newly developed BV prediction equations (Oberholzer et al ., 2023) to previously validated equations (Nadler and Pearson). Methods: In 52 adults with HFpEF (65% female; age: 70±7 years; BMI: 38±7[GM1] kg/m 2 ) we assessed total hemoglobin mass via carbon monoxide rebreathing, enabling calculation of BV. We estimated BV with the Oberholzer simple (age, sex, height and body mass) and clinical (age, height, and lean mass) equations, as well as Nadler and Pearson equations. Data were compared via either paired or independent samples t-tests or a one-way ANOVA with values presented as mean [95% CI] or mean ± standard deviation. Results: Unlike the Oberholzer simple (-226 [-507 – 55] ml, P =0.113) equation, the Oberholzer clinical equation significantly underestimated measured BV (-513 [-807 – 219] ml, P =0.001); both of which were imprecise with large typical error values (TE; Simple: 11%; Clinical: 11%). Compared to the Oberholzer equations, the mean estimated-measured difference was greater with the Nadler ( P <0.001; TE=12%) and Pearson ( P <0.001; TE=11%) equations (Figure 1A). We observed greater accuracy and precision of all prediction equations for females compared to males (Figure 1B-C): Oberholzer simple ( P =0.070); Oberholzer clinical ( P =0.047); Nadler ( P <0.001); Pearson ( P <0.043). Conclusions: The Oberholzer simple equation yielded the most accurate and precise prediction of BV in adults with HFpEF, with greater accuracy and precision in females. However, all prediction equations remain imprecise with substantial error up to 11% and should therefore be used with caution. As such, there needs to be more widespread measurement of BV to refine prediction equations utilized in clinical settings.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Southwestern Medical Center (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.