Abstract 4146563: Physician follow up and cardiac testing after a first diagnosis with secondary vs. primary atrial fibrillation in-hospital

Background: Secondary atrial fibrillation (AF) is triggered by acute illness and associated with adverse outcomes. Timely follow-up is recommended by the American Heart Association statement on acute AF. Hypotheses: Patients with secondary AF receive less follow-up and cardiac testing than those primarily hospitalized for AF (primary AF). Follow-up is lower for secondary AF patients hospitalized for noncardiac diagnoses. Methods: Population-based cohort study using linked administrative datasets of patients aged ≥66 yrs discharged alive after a new diagnosis of AF while hospitalized in Ontario between Apr 2013 - Mar 2019. Patients were classified as secondary or primary AF using a validated approach based on discharge diagnosis type and followed for 1yr. Outcomes included physician visits (family physicians [FP], internists, cardiologists), and cardiac testing (electrocardiograms [ECG], echocardiograms, ambulatory ECG monitoring). The cumulative incidence function was used to quantify the incidence of outcomes. Cause-specific hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) associated with hospitalization type in secondary AF patients. Regression analyses accounted for competing risks. Results: We studied 13,011 secondary AF (35.2% cardiac surgery, 9.6% cardiac medical, 17% noncardiac surgery, 38.1% noncardiac medical) and 11,065 primary AF patients. Secondary AF was associated with lower age, male sex, less heart failure, and greater prevalence of other comorbidities. Less than 50% of secondary AF patients had visits to internists, cardiologists, echocardiograms or ambulatory ECG monitoring (see Figure). The incidence of all outcomes was significantly lower for secondary than primary AF. Among secondary AF patients, specialist follow-up and cardiac testing rates were lowest after noncardiac diagnoses (see Table). Conclusion: Patients with secondary AF have less specialist follow-up and cardiac testing than primary AF, especially if hospitalized for noncardiac diagnoses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4146563
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4146563: Physician follow up and cardiac testing after a first diagnosis with secondary vs. primary atrial fibrillation in-hospital

Andrew C.T. Ha, Cynthia A. Jackevicius, Dennis T. Ko, Sheldon Singh et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Abstract 4146563: Physician follow up and cardiac testing after a first diagnosis with secondary vs. primary atrial fibrillation in-hospital

Andrew C.T. Ha, Cynthia A. Jackevicius, Dennis T. Ko, Sheldon Singh, Husam Mohamed Abdel-Qadir, Basma Mohammed, Douglas S. Lee, Paul Dorian, Jiming Fang, Peter Austin
article en

Abstract

Background: Secondary atrial fibrillation (AF) is triggered by acute illness and associated with adverse outcomes. Timely follow-up is recommended by the American Heart Association statement on acute AF. Hypotheses: Patients with secondary AF receive less follow-up and cardiac testing than those primarily hospitalized for AF (primary AF). Follow-up is lower for secondary AF patients hospitalized for noncardiac diagnoses. Methods: Population-based cohort study using linked administrative datasets of patients aged ≥66 yrs discharged alive after a new diagnosis of AF while hospitalized in Ontario between Apr 2013 - Mar 2019. Patients were classified as secondary or primary AF using a validated approach based on discharge diagnosis type and followed for 1yr. Outcomes included physician visits (family physicians [FP], internists, cardiologists), and cardiac testing (electrocardiograms [ECG], echocardiograms, ambulatory ECG monitoring). The cumulative incidence function was used to quantify the incidence of outcomes. Cause-specific hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) associated with hospitalization type in secondary AF patients. Regression analyses accounted for competing risks. Results: We studied 13,011 secondary AF (35.2% cardiac surgery, 9.6% cardiac medical, 17% noncardiac surgery, 38.1% noncardiac medical) and 11,065 primary AF patients. Secondary AF was associated with lower age, male sex, less heart failure, and greater prevalence of other comorbidities. Less than 50% of secondary AF patients had visits to internists, cardiologists, echocardiograms or ambulatory ECG monitoring (see Figure). The incidence of all outcomes was significantly lower for secondary than primary AF. Among secondary AF patients, specialist follow-up and cardiac testing rates were lowest after noncardiac diagnoses (see Table). Conclusion: Patients with secondary AF have less specialist follow-up and cardiac testing than primary AF, especially if hospitalized for noncardiac diagnoses.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
California Western School of Law (US), Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University Health Network (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA), Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.