Abstract 4146464: The Clinical and Electrocardiographic Phenotype of Genotype Negative Long QT Syndrome

Background: LQTS is a genetic heart disease associated with an increased risk of sudden death. Despite advances in genetic testing, a small subset of patients still lacks identifiable genetic markers. Consequently, the true prevalence and clinical phenotype of genotype negative remains to be determined. Objective: To determine the prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients with a clinical diagnosis of LQTS but a negative genetic test. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients evaluated and treated at a tertiary hospital between 2000 and 2024, focusing on those with a clinical diagnosis of LQTS, but a negative genetic test for all LQTS-associated genes, with available follow-up of at least 1 year. Results: After exclusion for follow-up and lack of genetic testing, the study cohort consisted of 1834 patients with LQTS including 1708 (93%) with a (likely) pathogenic (LP/P), LQTS-causative variant. Also, in 95 patients (5%), their variant of uncertain significance was clinically upgraded to a LP/P-variant, leaving only 31 patients classified as phenotype positive but genotype negative (1.6%). Of these, 16/31 underwent next-generation genetic sequencing, revealing the genetic cause in 6/16 cases (37%; 0.3% of all patients). For the remaining 25 genotype negative LQTS patients (1.3%), the mean age at diagnosis was 26 ± 15 years, with 19 (76%) being female, and an average initial QTc of 497 ± 41 ms. In total, 11 patients (44%) experienced a cardiac event before diagnosis [1 sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), 1 Torsades, 1 VT, 8 syncopes] and 1 patient had his first cardiac event during follow-up; 7/12 patients had more than one subsequent event. Twenty patients were proband (80%) and 6 had a family history of SCA. Eleven patients received an ICD (44%), left cardiac sympathetic denervation was performed in 4 (16%), and 2 patients experienced arrhythmia-related deaths (8%). The mean follow-up since diagnosis was 7 ± 5 years. Conclusion: With a prevalence of genotype-negative LQTS of 2%, the number of these patients is much lower than previously suggested, underscoring the advancements in identifying new genetic markers and the role of phenotype-enhanced variant adjudication and next-generation sequencing. Additionally, significant disease severity was observed in the remaining patients, emphasizing the pivotal role of genotype-phenotype correlations and risk stratification in managing and counseling patients lacking identified LQTS-causing mutations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4146464
Primary Topic
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4146464: The Clinical and Electrocardiographic Phenotype of Genotype Negative Long QT Syndrome

Iuri Ferreira Félix, John Giudicessi, Raquel Neves, Sahej Bains et al.
1 links
Circulation
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
article

Abstract 4146464: The Clinical and Electrocardiographic Phenotype of Genotype Negative Long QT Syndrome

Iuri Ferreira Félix, John Giudicessi, Raquel Neves, Sahej Bains, David J. Tester, Michael John Ackerman, J. Martijn Bos, Vanessa Karlinski Vizentin
article en

Abstract

Background: LQTS is a genetic heart disease associated with an increased risk of sudden death. Despite advances in genetic testing, a small subset of patients still lacks identifiable genetic markers. Consequently, the true prevalence and clinical phenotype of genotype negative remains to be determined. Objective: To determine the prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients with a clinical diagnosis of LQTS but a negative genetic test. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients evaluated and treated at a tertiary hospital between 2000 and 2024, focusing on those with a clinical diagnosis of LQTS, but a negative genetic test for all LQTS-associated genes, with available follow-up of at least 1 year. Results: After exclusion for follow-up and lack of genetic testing, the study cohort consisted of 1834 patients with LQTS including 1708 (93%) with a (likely) pathogenic (LP/P), LQTS-causative variant. Also, in 95 patients (5%), their variant of uncertain significance was clinically upgraded to a LP/P-variant, leaving only 31 patients classified as phenotype positive but genotype negative (1.6%). Of these, 16/31 underwent next-generation genetic sequencing, revealing the genetic cause in 6/16 cases (37%; 0.3% of all patients). For the remaining 25 genotype negative LQTS patients (1.3%), the mean age at diagnosis was 26 ± 15 years, with 19 (76%) being female, and an average initial QTc of 497 ± 41 ms. In total, 11 patients (44%) experienced a cardiac event before diagnosis [1 sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), 1 Torsades, 1 VT, 8 syncopes] and 1 patient had his first cardiac event during follow-up; 7/12 patients had more than one subsequent event. Twenty patients were proband (80%) and 6 had a family history of SCA. Eleven patients received an ICD (44%), left cardiac sympathetic denervation was performed in 4 (16%), and 2 patients experienced arrhythmia-related deaths (8%). The mean follow-up since diagnosis was 7 ± 5 years. Conclusion: With a prevalence of genotype-negative LQTS of 2%, the number of these patients is much lower than previously suggested, underscoring the advancements in identifying new genetic markers and the role of phenotype-enhanced variant adjudication and next-generation sequencing. Additionally, significant disease severity was observed in the remaining patients, emphasizing the pivotal role of genotype-phenotype correlations and risk stratification in managing and counseling patients lacking identified LQTS-causing mutations.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Mayo Clinic (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.