Abstract 4146514: Safety and Contemporary Trends of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients 85 Years and Older versus Less Than 85 Years

Background: There is a relative lack of comparative effectiveness research on the safety profile of left atrial appendage occlusion devices (LAAO) in patients ≥ over 85 years of age. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that patients who underwent LAAO older than 85 years will have similar odds of mortality and post-procedure complications when compared with younger patients. Aim: We aim to examine the safety of the in-hospital mortality and immediate complications of patients ≥85 years who underwent LAAO compared to those < 85 years. Methods: Patients undergoing LAAO from 2016-2021 were queried from the National Inpatient Sample. Using propensity score matching, patients were matched into two cohorts based on age ( ≥85 years and <85 years) in a 1:1 fashion using the ≥85 cohort as the dependent variable. In-patient mortality, post-procedure complications, and LAAO placement trends were compared using logistic regression models. The total complication outcome summarizes pericardial, cardiac, pulmonary, vascular, renal, neurologic, and infectious complications. Results: 136,075 patients underwent LAAO; each group included 19,015 patients. The overall mean age for the older group was 87.2 ± 1.0 years vs. 74.2 ± 5.1 years for the younger cohort. There were no associations between the two cohorts in in-patient mortality and total complications (aOR 1.40; 95% CI 0.44-4.42; p= 0.57) and (aOR 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79-1.01; p= 0.07). There was no significant difference in major circulatory events (aOR 0.85; 95% CI 0.75-1.01), but the odds of bleeding requiring transfusion were higher in the older cohort compared to the younger cohort (aOR 2.19; 95% CI 1.10-4.37). Overall, total complications and major cardiac, vascular, circulatory, renal, and neurologic complications were not statistically significantly different between cohorts. There was a significant increase in LAAO placement from 2016 to 2021 in both cohorts [>85 (p= 0.04);<85 (p= 0.02)] Conclusion: In the 2016-2021 National Inpatient Sample, patients who underwent LAAO aged ≥85 had comparable inpatient mortality and post-procedure complications to younger patients. These results contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the safety of LAAO in elderly patients aged 85 and above.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4146514
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4146514: Safety and Contemporary Trends of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients 85 Years and Older versus Less Than 85 Years

Luigi Di Biase, Nelson P. Barrera, Roberto Cerrud‐Rodriguez, FRANCISCO GALLEGOS KOYNER et al.
Circulation
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4146514: Safety and Contemporary Trends of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients 85 Years and Older versus Less Than 85 Years

Luigi Di Biase, Nelson P. Barrera, Roberto Cerrud‐Rodriguez, FRANCISCO GALLEGOS KOYNER, Salomon Chamay, Katerina Jou
article en

Abstract

Background: There is a relative lack of comparative effectiveness research on the safety profile of left atrial appendage occlusion devices (LAAO) in patients ≥ over 85 years of age. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that patients who underwent LAAO older than 85 years will have similar odds of mortality and post-procedure complications when compared with younger patients. Aim: We aim to examine the safety of the in-hospital mortality and immediate complications of patients ≥85 years who underwent LAAO compared to those < 85 years. Methods: Patients undergoing LAAO from 2016-2021 were queried from the National Inpatient Sample. Using propensity score matching, patients were matched into two cohorts based on age ( ≥85 years and <85 years) in a 1:1 fashion using the ≥85 cohort as the dependent variable. In-patient mortality, post-procedure complications, and LAAO placement trends were compared using logistic regression models. The total complication outcome summarizes pericardial, cardiac, pulmonary, vascular, renal, neurologic, and infectious complications. Results: 136,075 patients underwent LAAO; each group included 19,015 patients. The overall mean age for the older group was 87.2 ± 1.0 years vs. 74.2 ± 5.1 years for the younger cohort. There were no associations between the two cohorts in in-patient mortality and total complications (aOR 1.40; 95% CI 0.44-4.42; p= 0.57) and (aOR 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79-1.01; p= 0.07). There was no significant difference in major circulatory events (aOR 0.85; 95% CI 0.75-1.01), but the odds of bleeding requiring transfusion were higher in the older cohort compared to the younger cohort (aOR 2.19; 95% CI 1.10-4.37). Overall, total complications and major cardiac, vascular, circulatory, renal, and neurologic complications were not statistically significantly different between cohorts. There was a significant increase in LAAO placement from 2016 to 2021 in both cohorts [>85 (p= 0.04);<85 (p= 0.02)] Conclusion: In the 2016-2021 National Inpatient Sample, patients who underwent LAAO aged ≥85 had comparable inpatient mortality and post-procedure complications to younger patients. These results contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the safety of LAAO in elderly patients aged 85 and above.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Yale New Haven Hospital (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US), St. Barnabas Hospital (US), SBH Behavioral Health (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.