Abstract 4146448: Real-world Outcomes of Nicotine Replacement Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Introduction: Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is a major global health issue, with smoking as a significant modifiable risk factor. Smoking cessation reduces recurrent coronary events, making it crucial in ACS management. Current protocols recommend smoking cessation education during hospitalization and referral to smoking cessation or outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs, where nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and bupropion are available. NRT, including patches, gum, and lozenges, helps alleviate withdrawal symptoms by providing a controlled nicotine dose. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that cautious initiation of NRT during hospitalization benefits ACS patients, with the benefits outweighing the risks. This study seeks to provide clarity and contribute to evidence-based guidelines for ACS management. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data were gathered from the TriNetX database. The study compared two cohorts: 122,198 patients who received NRT and were hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or unstable angina (UA), and 160,387 patients who did not receive NRT but were admitted for the same conditions. The follow-up period began on the day of the index event and continued for 30 days. Cardiovascular outcomes were compared between propensity score-matched patients with and without NRT. Results: Patients receiving NRT had a reduced risk of several cardiovascular outcomes compared to those who did not receive NRT, including atrial fibrillation and flutter (RR [95% CI]=0.822[0.792-0.854, p<0.01]) and ventricular fibrillation and flutter (RR [95% CI]=0.715[0.654-0.781, p<0.01]). The risk of death was also reduced (RR [95% CI]=0.701[0.678-0.726, p<0.01]). Hospital readmissions were less frequent in the NRT group (RR [95% CI]= 0.960[0.955-0.965, p<0.01]). Additionally, the risk of cardiac arrest was lower (RR [95% CI]= 0.698[0.660-0.738, p<0.01]), and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) was less common (RR [95% CI]= 0.883[0.827-0.942, p<0.01]). These results highlight the potential benefits of NRT in reducing the risk of various cardiac events following AMI or UA. Conclusions: The cautious initiation of NRT during hospitalization can benefit ACS patients where the benefits outweigh the risks. This study aims to provide clarity and contribute to evidence-based guidelines for ACS management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4146448
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4146448: Real-world Outcomes of Nicotine Replacement Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Manraj Sekhon, Arush Rajotia, Jasninder Singh Dhaliwal, Kamleshun Ramphul et al.
1 citations
Circulation
Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
0.23
article

Abstract 4146448: Real-world Outcomes of Nicotine Replacement Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Manraj Sekhon, Arush Rajotia, Jasninder Singh Dhaliwal, Kamleshun Ramphul, Swaiman Singh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is a major global health issue, with smoking as a significant modifiable risk factor. Smoking cessation reduces recurrent coronary events, making it crucial in ACS management. Current protocols recommend smoking cessation education during hospitalization and referral to smoking cessation or outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs, where nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and bupropion are available. NRT, including patches, gum, and lozenges, helps alleviate withdrawal symptoms by providing a controlled nicotine dose. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that cautious initiation of NRT during hospitalization benefits ACS patients, with the benefits outweighing the risks. This study seeks to provide clarity and contribute to evidence-based guidelines for ACS management. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data were gathered from the TriNetX database. The study compared two cohorts: 122,198 patients who received NRT and were hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or unstable angina (UA), and 160,387 patients who did not receive NRT but were admitted for the same conditions. The follow-up period began on the day of the index event and continued for 30 days. Cardiovascular outcomes were compared between propensity score-matched patients with and without NRT. Results: Patients receiving NRT had a reduced risk of several cardiovascular outcomes compared to those who did not receive NRT, including atrial fibrillation and flutter (RR [95% CI]=0.822[0.792-0.854, p<0.01]) and ventricular fibrillation and flutter (RR [95% CI]=0.715[0.654-0.781, p<0.01]). The risk of death was also reduced (RR [95% CI]=0.701[0.678-0.726, p<0.01]). Hospital readmissions were less frequent in the NRT group (RR [95% CI]= 0.960[0.955-0.965, p<0.01]). Additionally, the risk of cardiac arrest was lower (RR [95% CI]= 0.698[0.660-0.738, p<0.01]), and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) was less common (RR [95% CI]= 0.883[0.827-0.942, p<0.01]). These results highlight the potential benefits of NRT in reducing the risk of various cardiac events following AMI or UA. Conclusions: The cautious initiation of NRT during hospitalization can benefit ACS patients where the benefits outweigh the risks. This study aims to provide clarity and contribute to evidence-based guidelines for ACS management.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of California, Riverside (US), Mayo Clinic (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
0.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.