Abstract 4146633: Catheter-Directed Intervention for High-Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the U.S. Nationwide Readmissions Database

Background: Catheter-Directed Interventions (CDIs) for Acute Pulmonary Embolism (PE) have been present for years but their use is limited due to paucity of data especially in patients with cancer. We examine the safety and efficacy of CDIs in patients with high-risk PE and cancer. Methods: Nationwide Readmissions Database (2016-2021) was used to analyze cancer patients presenting with high-risk PE (HR-PE) (shock, pressor or mechanical circulatory support requirement). Patients who received systematic thrombolysis were excluded. Mahalanobis Distance Matching within the Propensity Score Caliper was used to match patient who received CDIs vs those who were treated with anticoagulation alone. Inverse Probability weighting (IPW) was utilized, and Pearson’s chi-squared test was applied to the PSM-2 matched cohorts to compare outcomes. Results: Among 265,196 hospitalization of cancer patients with HR-PE, X were treated with systemic thrombolysis and 795 (0.3%) of the patients underwent CDI. After propensity matching (N: 421 in each group), patients receiving CDI had a significantly lower mortality (33% vs. 41.8%, aOR:0.76 (95% CI, p: 0.008); However, bleeding complications including major bleeding (10.7% vs 6.2%, aOR:1.97 (95% CI, p: 0.018) was higher in patients receiving CDIs. No difference was observed in the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (p>0.05). Readmission rates were similar at 30-day and 90-day intervals (p>0.05). From 2016-2021, mortality associated with HR-PE in cancer has not changed significantly (p>0.05); however, mortality in patients undergoing CDIs has decreased from (43.8% to 22.6%, p-trend: 0.0004). There has been increasing use of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) over thrombolysis in recent years. Conclusion: CDIs for HR-PE in cancer patients are associated with significant reduction in mortality and associated with higher bleeding. Mortality has decreased across the years for patients undergoing CDIs with higher utilization of MT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4146633
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4146633: Catheter-Directed Intervention for High-Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the U.S. Nationwide Readmissions Database

Aneeza Jamshed, Mukunthan Murthi, Qamar Arman, Javier Gomez Valencia et al.
Circulation
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Abstract 4146633: Catheter-Directed Intervention for High-Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the U.S. Nationwide Readmissions Database

Aneeza Jamshed, Mukunthan Murthi, Qamar Arman, Javier Gomez Valencia, Mark J Ricciardi, Nomesh Kumar, Nso Nso, Shafaqat Ali, Manoj Kumar
article en

Abstract

Background: Catheter-Directed Interventions (CDIs) for Acute Pulmonary Embolism (PE) have been present for years but their use is limited due to paucity of data especially in patients with cancer. We examine the safety and efficacy of CDIs in patients with high-risk PE and cancer. Methods: Nationwide Readmissions Database (2016-2021) was used to analyze cancer patients presenting with high-risk PE (HR-PE) (shock, pressor or mechanical circulatory support requirement). Patients who received systematic thrombolysis were excluded. Mahalanobis Distance Matching within the Propensity Score Caliper was used to match patient who received CDIs vs those who were treated with anticoagulation alone. Inverse Probability weighting (IPW) was utilized, and Pearson’s chi-squared test was applied to the PSM-2 matched cohorts to compare outcomes. Results: Among 265,196 hospitalization of cancer patients with HR-PE, X were treated with systemic thrombolysis and 795 (0.3%) of the patients underwent CDI. After propensity matching (N: 421 in each group), patients receiving CDI had a significantly lower mortality (33% vs. 41.8%, aOR:0.76 (95% CI, p: 0.008); However, bleeding complications including major bleeding (10.7% vs 6.2%, aOR:1.97 (95% CI, p: 0.018) was higher in patients receiving CDIs. No difference was observed in the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (p>0.05). Readmission rates were similar at 30-day and 90-day intervals (p>0.05). From 2016-2021, mortality associated with HR-PE in cancer has not changed significantly (p>0.05); however, mortality in patients undergoing CDIs has decreased from (43.8% to 22.6%, p-trend: 0.0004). There has been increasing use of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) over thrombolysis in recent years. Conclusion: CDIs for HR-PE in cancer patients are associated with significant reduction in mortality and associated with higher bleeding. Mortality has decreased across the years for patients undergoing CDIs with higher utilization of MT.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
NorthShore University HealthSystem (US), Wayne State University (US), Louisiana State University in Shreveport (US), John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County (US), Cook County Health and Hospitals System (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.