Abstract 4147138: Cardiovascular and Bleeding Outcomes of Proton-Pump Inhibitor and Clopidogrel Co-therapy after Percutaneous Intervention: A Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Clinical studies have shown conflicting results regarding the effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on the antiplatelet action of clopidogrel in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and mortality outcomes in 6 months of concurrent use of these medications. Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase, screened 1071 articles, and included seven articles meeting our inclusion criteria: randomized control trials comparing the PPI group to the control group (no PPI) in patients on clopidogrel with CAD for six months. The outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), arrhythmia, bleeding, all-cause death, and cardiovascular (CV) death. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. We assessed heterogeneity between studies and p-value was assigned to <0.05 for statistical significance. Results: Seven studies with a total of 5146 patients (PPI group: 2585, No-PPI: 2561). Our analysis shows that use of PPI with clopidogrel is associated with less bleeding outcomes (RR: 0.30, CI:0.19-0.49; p-value:<0.0001). Table 1. Our analysis showed no difference with regard to myocardial infarction (RR: 0.96; CI: 0.51-1.79, p-value:0.897), major cardiovascular events (RR: 0.99; CI: 0.74-1.32, p-value: 0.944), the onset of heart failure (RR: 0.78; CI: 0.27-2.25, p-value: 0.643), arrhythmias (RR: 0.86; CI: 0.30-2.43, p-value: 0.775), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.78; CI: 0.29-2.07, p-value: 0.623), and all-cause mortality (RR: 0.77; CI: 0.39-1.51, p-value: 0.451). Figure 1. Conclusions: In patients taking clopidogrel, proton pump inhibitors are associated with decreased bleeding outcomes. Our study showed no difference in terms of cardiovascular and mortality outcomes. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate these results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4147138
Primary Topic
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4147138: Cardiovascular and Bleeding Outcomes of Proton-Pump Inhibitor and Clopidogrel Co-therapy after Percutaneous Intervention: A Meta-Analysis

Sahib Singh, Yasar Sattar, Prasanna Sengodan, Mobeen Z. Haider et al.
Circulation
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
article

Abstract 4147138: Cardiovascular and Bleeding Outcomes of Proton-Pump Inhibitor and Clopidogrel Co-therapy after Percutaneous Intervention: A Meta-Analysis

Sahib Singh, Yasar Sattar, Prasanna Sengodan, Mobeen Z. Haider, Nismat Javed, Junaid Mir, Yousra Khalid, Subanandhini Subramaniam Parameshwari, Mohammad Hamza
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical studies have shown conflicting results regarding the effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on the antiplatelet action of clopidogrel in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and mortality outcomes in 6 months of concurrent use of these medications. Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase, screened 1071 articles, and included seven articles meeting our inclusion criteria: randomized control trials comparing the PPI group to the control group (no PPI) in patients on clopidogrel with CAD for six months. The outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), arrhythmia, bleeding, all-cause death, and cardiovascular (CV) death. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. We assessed heterogeneity between studies and p-value was assigned to <0.05 for statistical significance. Results: Seven studies with a total of 5146 patients (PPI group: 2585, No-PPI: 2561). Our analysis shows that use of PPI with clopidogrel is associated with less bleeding outcomes (RR: 0.30, CI:0.19-0.49; p-value:<0.0001). Table 1. Our analysis showed no difference with regard to myocardial infarction (RR: 0.96; CI: 0.51-1.79, p-value:0.897), major cardiovascular events (RR: 0.99; CI: 0.74-1.32, p-value: 0.944), the onset of heart failure (RR: 0.78; CI: 0.27-2.25, p-value: 0.643), arrhythmias (RR: 0.86; CI: 0.30-2.43, p-value: 0.775), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.78; CI: 0.29-2.07, p-value: 0.623), and all-cause mortality (RR: 0.77; CI: 0.39-1.51, p-value: 0.451). Figure 1. Conclusions: In patients taking clopidogrel, proton pump inhibitors are associated with decreased bleeding outcomes. Our study showed no difference in terms of cardiovascular and mortality outcomes. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate these results.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
West Virginia University (US), Prisma Health (US), Carle Foundation Hospital (US), Sinai Hospital (US), The Ohio State University (US), University of Missouri (US), Albany Medical Center Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.