Abstract 4146808: Evaluating the Impact of Simulation Training on Transesophageal Echocardiography Proficiency in Fellows: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction: Simulation-based training systems for Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) have been developed for medical education, but evidence on their effectiveness remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of simulation-based teaching compared to traditional methods in imparting TEE knowledge and skills to fellows. Methods: A literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The primary endpoint was (1) post-intervention skill or knowledge assessment. A subgroup analysis was performed comparing anesthesiology and cardiology fellows. Additionally, a secondary single-arm analysis evaluated (2) the recommendation rate for simulation training among participants who underwent this form of tutoring. Statistical analysis was done using R Studio 4.3.2. Results: We included 9 RCTs encompassing 602 fellows, of whom 293 (48.67%) underwent simulation training TEE with a mean age of 25. In the pooled analysis, the simulation group's post-test scores for TEE proficiency were significantly higher compared to the control group (SMD: 0.86; 95% [CI] 0.48-1.24; p < 0.01; Figure 1A). Our subgroup analysis showed no significant difference between anesthesiology and cardiology fellows (p=0.36; Figure 1B). The Likert recommendation score indicated a high recommendation rate of 92% (95% CI 0.75-1.00; Figure 2) for the simulation education group. Conclusion: In this updated meta-analysis, fellows who underwent simulation training for TEE achieved higher post-assessment scores, and the Likert recommendation rate for simulation-based teaching was high. Additionally, there were no significant subgroup differences between the cardiology and anesthesiology fellows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4146808
Primary Topic
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4146808: Evaluating the Impact of Simulation Training on Transesophageal Echocardiography Proficiency in Fellows: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Christian Ken Fukunaga, Wilson Falco Neto, Luciana Gioli‐Pereira, Rafael Petri Santos Pinheiro et al.
Circulation
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
article

Abstract 4146808: Evaluating the Impact of Simulation Training on Transesophageal Echocardiography Proficiency in Fellows: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Christian Ken Fukunaga, Wilson Falco Neto, Luciana Gioli‐Pereira, Rafael Petri Santos Pinheiro, Ana Carolina Coan, Pedro Gabriel Scardini, Eric Katsuyama, Naieli Andrade, A Prata, Júlia Fernandes
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Simulation-based training systems for Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) have been developed for medical education, but evidence on their effectiveness remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of simulation-based teaching compared to traditional methods in imparting TEE knowledge and skills to fellows. Methods: A literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The primary endpoint was (1) post-intervention skill or knowledge assessment. A subgroup analysis was performed comparing anesthesiology and cardiology fellows. Additionally, a secondary single-arm analysis evaluated (2) the recommendation rate for simulation training among participants who underwent this form of tutoring. Statistical analysis was done using R Studio 4.3.2. Results: We included 9 RCTs encompassing 602 fellows, of whom 293 (48.67%) underwent simulation training TEE with a mean age of 25. In the pooled analysis, the simulation group's post-test scores for TEE proficiency were significantly higher compared to the control group (SMD: 0.86; 95% [CI] 0.48-1.24; p < 0.01; Figure 1A). Our subgroup analysis showed no significant difference between anesthesiology and cardiology fellows (p=0.36; Figure 1B). The Likert recommendation score indicated a high recommendation rate of 92% (95% CI 0.75-1.00; Figure 2) for the simulation education group. Conclusion: In this updated meta-analysis, fellows who underwent simulation training for TEE achieved higher post-assessment scores, and the Likert recommendation rate for simulation-based teaching was high. Additionally, there were no significant subgroup differences between the cardiology and anesthesiology fellows.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (BR), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR), Escola Superior de Ciências da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória (BR), Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (BR), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (BR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.