Abstract 4147376: Leveraging Telemedicine to Assess Care Quality Among Rural-Residing Patients with Heart Failure: The Rural-HF Registry

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) poses a major public health challenge in the United States, and patients in rural areas experience worse HF outcomes. Telemedicine has effectively provided access to specialty cardiovascular care to hospitalized patients in rural hospitals. A better understanding of care quality among patients hospitalized with HF in rural hospitals is needed to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population. Methods: We developed a virtual registry of patients hospitalized with acute HF in rural hospitals in collaboration with the American Heart Association (Grant: 23DSG1154425) and Access Telecare, a nationwide telehealth provider. Patients hospitalized to 13 rural hospitals across Texas, Indiana, South Carolina, and New Mexico are prospectively enrolled. Patients with acute HF are identified with an ICD 10 code for HF in the primary or first secondary position. Demographics, in-hospital care, post-discharge follow-up, and discharge utilization of GDMT (renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors (RAASi), beta-blockers (BB), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) for HFrEF; RAASi, MRA, SGLT2i for HFpEF) were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Results: As of June 6, 2024, 254 patients (mean age 72 y, 40.2% female, 7.5% Black) were included (Table). 42.1% had HFrEF. 37% underwent LVEF assessment during the hospital stay. 74.4% of all patients received any GDMT at any dose, 4.7% received all classes of GDMT at any dose, and only 1.2% were prescribed GDMT at optimal doses. Among patients with HFrEF, evidence-based (vs non-evidence-based) BB was 58.9% and 15%, respectively. Furthermore, 74.7% of patients with HFrEF received ≤ 2 GDMT classes. At discharge, 0.4% of patients were referred for cardiac rehabilitation and 41.3% had a follow-up visit scheduled. Among patients with a history of atrial fibrillation/flutter, the rate of anticoagulation was 57.3%. Conclusion: There are considerable implementation gaps in GDMT and post-discharge care for patients with HF hospitalized in rural areas. Effective and scalable telemedicine interventions are needed to improve the uptake of GDMT among hospitalized HF patients in rural areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4147376
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4147376: Leveraging Telemedicine to Assess Care Quality Among Rural-Residing Patients with Heart Failure: The Rural-HF Registry

Katherine Sánchez, Javed Butler, John C. Gallagher, Neil Keshvani et al.
Circulation
Healthcare Systems and Practices
article

Abstract 4147376: Leveraging Telemedicine to Assess Care Quality Among Rural-Residing Patients with Heart Failure: The Rural-HF Registry

Katherine Sánchez, Javed Butler, John C. Gallagher, Neil Keshvani, Pritam Ghosh, James W. Miller, Ambarish Pandey
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) poses a major public health challenge in the United States, and patients in rural areas experience worse HF outcomes. Telemedicine has effectively provided access to specialty cardiovascular care to hospitalized patients in rural hospitals. A better understanding of care quality among patients hospitalized with HF in rural hospitals is needed to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population. Methods: We developed a virtual registry of patients hospitalized with acute HF in rural hospitals in collaboration with the American Heart Association (Grant: 23DSG1154425) and Access Telecare, a nationwide telehealth provider. Patients hospitalized to 13 rural hospitals across Texas, Indiana, South Carolina, and New Mexico are prospectively enrolled. Patients with acute HF are identified with an ICD 10 code for HF in the primary or first secondary position. Demographics, in-hospital care, post-discharge follow-up, and discharge utilization of GDMT (renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors (RAASi), beta-blockers (BB), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) for HFrEF; RAASi, MRA, SGLT2i for HFpEF) were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Results: As of June 6, 2024, 254 patients (mean age 72 y, 40.2% female, 7.5% Black) were included (Table). 42.1% had HFrEF. 37% underwent LVEF assessment during the hospital stay. 74.4% of all patients received any GDMT at any dose, 4.7% received all classes of GDMT at any dose, and only 1.2% were prescribed GDMT at optimal doses. Among patients with HFrEF, evidence-based (vs non-evidence-based) BB was 58.9% and 15%, respectively. Furthermore, 74.7% of patients with HFrEF received ≤ 2 GDMT classes. At discharge, 0.4% of patients were referred for cardiac rehabilitation and 41.3% had a follow-up visit scheduled. Among patients with a history of atrial fibrillation/flutter, the rate of anticoagulation was 57.3%. Conclusion: There are considerable implementation gaps in GDMT and post-discharge care for patients with HF hospitalized in rural areas. Effective and scalable telemedicine interventions are needed to improve the uptake of GDMT among hospitalized HF patients in rural areas.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Baylor Scott & White Health (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Healthcare Systems and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.