Abstract 4147463: Impact of Timing on Outcomes in Rescue PCI for STEMI: Early vs. Late Intervention
Introduction: American guidelines recommend rescue PCI within 3 to 24 hours after failed fibrinolysis in patients with ongoing ischemia, hemodynamic instability, or other high-risk features. Given the large areas covered by relatively few centers, rescue PCI can be delayed. Aims: This abstract aims to compare complications in patients undergoing early rescue PCI (within 6 hours post-thrombolysis) versus late rescue PCI (more than 6 hours post-thrombolysis). Methods: A prospective registry was conducted, patients over 18 years with diagnosis of STEMI undergoing rescue PCI (reperfusion therapy when thrombolysis has failed) in a tertiary cardiology center in Mexico from august of 2023 to april of 2024 were included. We divided patients into two groups, the ones who received early rescue PCI (within 6 hours post-thrombolysis) versus late rescue PCI (more than 6 hours post-thrombolysis). Results: 109 patients who received late Rescue PCI and 56 patients who received early Rescue PCI were included. Baseline characteristics in patients undergoing Rescue PCI before and after 6 hours are presented in table 1. Patients who underwent late rescue PCI showed worsening heart failure (KK: Killip Kimball IV) 14.2% vs 9.1% (p= 0.319.). The Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) reported with statistical significance are angina (p value 0.048) and especially renal failure (p= 0.016). The survival rate was significantly higher when the patient entered rescue PCI after 6 hours 95.4% vs 89.2% (p = 0.023). Conclusion: Although no specific time frame has been set for rescue PCI, patients who underwent to rescue PCI within six hours showed worsening outcomes such as angina and renal failure, possibly due to higher KK grades, the onset of cardiogenic shock, and lower survival rates. A major limitation of our study was the small sample size, which restricted comparisons of MACE with other outcomes. This limitation is expected to improve as our database expands. Despite these findings, it is essential to base the decision to perform a rescue PCI on the patient's initial condition upon arrival at a capable PCI center.
Authors
- Alexandra Arias (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0974-3404)
- Ximena Latapi Ruiz Esparza (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6581-8805)
- Alberto Santiago Hernández
- Reto Bale (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0021-5792)
- Jorge Vargas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7738-245X)
- Diego Araiza
- Eder González Macedo
- Beatriz Díaz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2658-2485)
- Heriberto Ontiveros Mercado
- A. Gracia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7341-4541)
- Mariana Garcia Villarejo
Institutions
- Hospital Juárez de México (MX)
- Instituto Nacional de Cardiología (MX)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Circulation
- Published
- 2024-11-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4147463
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00