Abstract 4147463: Impact of Timing on Outcomes in Rescue PCI for STEMI: Early vs. Late Intervention

Introduction: American guidelines recommend rescue PCI within 3 to 24 hours after failed fibrinolysis in patients with ongoing ischemia, hemodynamic instability, or other high-risk features. Given the large areas covered by relatively few centers, rescue PCI can be delayed. Aims: This abstract aims to compare complications in patients undergoing early rescue PCI (within 6 hours post-thrombolysis) versus late rescue PCI (more than 6 hours post-thrombolysis). Methods: A prospective registry was conducted, patients over 18 years with diagnosis of STEMI undergoing rescue PCI (reperfusion therapy when thrombolysis has failed) in a tertiary cardiology center in Mexico from august of 2023 to april of 2024 were included. We divided patients into two groups, the ones who received early rescue PCI (within 6 hours post-thrombolysis) versus late rescue PCI (more than 6 hours post-thrombolysis). Results: 109 patients who received late Rescue PCI and 56 patients who received early Rescue PCI were included. Baseline characteristics in patients undergoing Rescue PCI before and after 6 hours are presented in table 1. Patients who underwent late rescue PCI showed worsening heart failure (KK: Killip Kimball IV) 14.2% vs 9.1% (p= 0.319.). The Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) reported with statistical significance are angina (p value 0.048) and especially renal failure (p= 0.016). The survival rate was significantly higher when the patient entered rescue PCI after 6 hours 95.4% vs 89.2% (p = 0.023). Conclusion: Although no specific time frame has been set for rescue PCI, patients who underwent to rescue PCI within six hours showed worsening outcomes such as angina and renal failure, possibly due to higher KK grades, the onset of cardiogenic shock, and lower survival rates. A major limitation of our study was the small sample size, which restricted comparisons of MACE with other outcomes. This limitation is expected to improve as our database expands. Despite these findings, it is essential to base the decision to perform a rescue PCI on the patient's initial condition upon arrival at a capable PCI center.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4147463
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4147463: Impact of Timing on Outcomes in Rescue PCI for STEMI: Early vs. Late Intervention

Alexandra Arias, Ximena Latapi Ruiz Esparza, Alberto Santiago Hernández, Reto Bale et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Abstract 4147463: Impact of Timing on Outcomes in Rescue PCI for STEMI: Early vs. Late Intervention

Alexandra Arias, Ximena Latapi Ruiz Esparza, Alberto Santiago Hernández, Reto Bale, Jorge Vargas, Diego Araiza, Eder González Macedo, Beatriz Díaz, Heriberto Ontiveros Mercado, A. Gracia, Mariana Garcia Villarejo
article en

Abstract

Introduction: American guidelines recommend rescue PCI within 3 to 24 hours after failed fibrinolysis in patients with ongoing ischemia, hemodynamic instability, or other high-risk features. Given the large areas covered by relatively few centers, rescue PCI can be delayed. Aims: This abstract aims to compare complications in patients undergoing early rescue PCI (within 6 hours post-thrombolysis) versus late rescue PCI (more than 6 hours post-thrombolysis). Methods: A prospective registry was conducted, patients over 18 years with diagnosis of STEMI undergoing rescue PCI (reperfusion therapy when thrombolysis has failed) in a tertiary cardiology center in Mexico from august of 2023 to april of 2024 were included. We divided patients into two groups, the ones who received early rescue PCI (within 6 hours post-thrombolysis) versus late rescue PCI (more than 6 hours post-thrombolysis). Results: 109 patients who received late Rescue PCI and 56 patients who received early Rescue PCI were included. Baseline characteristics in patients undergoing Rescue PCI before and after 6 hours are presented in table 1. Patients who underwent late rescue PCI showed worsening heart failure (KK: Killip Kimball IV) 14.2% vs 9.1% (p= 0.319.). The Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) reported with statistical significance are angina (p value 0.048) and especially renal failure (p= 0.016). The survival rate was significantly higher when the patient entered rescue PCI after 6 hours 95.4% vs 89.2% (p = 0.023). Conclusion: Although no specific time frame has been set for rescue PCI, patients who underwent to rescue PCI within six hours showed worsening outcomes such as angina and renal failure, possibly due to higher KK grades, the onset of cardiogenic shock, and lower survival rates. A major limitation of our study was the small sample size, which restricted comparisons of MACE with other outcomes. This limitation is expected to improve as our database expands. Despite these findings, it is essential to base the decision to perform a rescue PCI on the patient's initial condition upon arrival at a capable PCI center.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Hospital Juárez de México (MX), Instituto Nacional de Cardiología (MX)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.