Abstract 4146626: CYP2C19 Genotyping Decreases 5 and 10-year Mortality in Patients With History of In-Stent Restenosis Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Introduction: CYP2C19 genotyping is a genetic test that checks for variations in the gene that codes for an enzyme that metabolizes clopidogrel. Testing has been shown to accurately predict response to clopidogrel; however, the impact of testing on mortality is not currently known. Hypothesis: Our objective was to compare the mortality among patients with a history of in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention and initiation of dual antiplatelet therapy who have undergone CYP2C19 genotyping to those who have not undergone CYP2C19 genotyping. We hypothesize that patients who underwent CYP2C19 genotyping will have decreased 5 and 10-year mortality. Methods: A large retrospective database, Trinetix, was used to identify patients aged greater than 18 years old with a history of in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention and initiation on dual antiplatelet therapy with either CYP2C19 genotyping or without CYP2C19 genotyping. Two cohorts were subsequently followed depending on if genotyping was performed. Student’s t-test was performed to compare baseline characteristics between cohorts. Demographics and comorbidities were used for 1:1 propensity matching. Kaplan-Myer curves and hazard-ratios were calculated to compare 5 and 10-year mortality. Results: Patients that underwent CYP2C19 genotyping (n=144) and did not undergo CYP2C19 genotyping (n=35,039) were propensity matched yielding 142 patients per cohort. In patients with a history of in-stent restenosis, CYP2C19 genotyping was associated with a decreased 5-year mortality (18.98% vs 29.93%; HR=0.542; 95% CI [0.331, 0.887], log-rank p= 0.0134) and 10-year mortality (23.36% vs. 34.31%; HR=0.542; 95% CI [0.345, 0.852], log-rank p=0.0071) compared to no CYP2C19 genotyping. Conclusion: In patients with a history of in-stent restenosis, undergoing CYP2C19 genotyping was associated with a decreased risk for mortality when compared to not undergoing CYP2C19 genotyping. Prospective randomized trials are needed to further guide patient selection for CYP2C19 genotyping.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4146626
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4146626: CYP2C19 Genotyping Decreases 5 and 10-year Mortality in Patients With History of In-Stent Restenosis Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Sanjana Datla, Zafer Sattouf, Roshan M. Patel, Dev Patel et al.
Circulation
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Abstract 4146626: CYP2C19 Genotyping Decreases 5 and 10-year Mortality in Patients With History of In-Stent Restenosis Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Sanjana Datla, Zafer Sattouf, Roshan M. Patel, Dev Patel, Bilal Ali, Julie E. Adams, Shilpkumar Arora
article en

Abstract

Introduction: CYP2C19 genotyping is a genetic test that checks for variations in the gene that codes for an enzyme that metabolizes clopidogrel. Testing has been shown to accurately predict response to clopidogrel; however, the impact of testing on mortality is not currently known. Hypothesis: Our objective was to compare the mortality among patients with a history of in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention and initiation of dual antiplatelet therapy who have undergone CYP2C19 genotyping to those who have not undergone CYP2C19 genotyping. We hypothesize that patients who underwent CYP2C19 genotyping will have decreased 5 and 10-year mortality. Methods: A large retrospective database, Trinetix, was used to identify patients aged greater than 18 years old with a history of in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention and initiation on dual antiplatelet therapy with either CYP2C19 genotyping or without CYP2C19 genotyping. Two cohorts were subsequently followed depending on if genotyping was performed. Student’s t-test was performed to compare baseline characteristics between cohorts. Demographics and comorbidities were used for 1:1 propensity matching. Kaplan-Myer curves and hazard-ratios were calculated to compare 5 and 10-year mortality. Results: Patients that underwent CYP2C19 genotyping (n=144) and did not undergo CYP2C19 genotyping (n=35,039) were propensity matched yielding 142 patients per cohort. In patients with a history of in-stent restenosis, CYP2C19 genotyping was associated with a decreased 5-year mortality (18.98% vs 29.93%; HR=0.542; 95% CI [0.331, 0.887], log-rank p= 0.0134) and 10-year mortality (23.36% vs. 34.31%; HR=0.542; 95% CI [0.345, 0.852], log-rank p=0.0071) compared to no CYP2C19 genotyping. Conclusion: In patients with a history of in-stent restenosis, undergoing CYP2C19 genotyping was associated with a decreased risk for mortality when compared to not undergoing CYP2C19 genotyping. Prospective randomized trials are needed to further guide patient selection for CYP2C19 genotyping.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Cleveland Clinic (US), University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.