Abstract 4146716: Radial Versus Femoral Access for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Stroke: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

Background: Femoral access is predominantly used for mechanical thrombectomy in stroke patients with large vessel occlusions. Following interventional cardiology guidelines, routine radial access has been proposed as an alternative, though its safety and efficacy remain controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radial versus femoral access for mechanical thrombectomy in patients with stroke. Hypothesis: In mechanical thrombectomy for stroke patients with large vessel occlusions, could the transradial access (TRA) result in comparable efficacy but fewer access site complications compared to transfemoral access (TFA)? Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to May 2024, to identify studies measuring the efficacy and safety of radial versus femoral access for mechanical thrombectomy in patients with stroke. The meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager and Open Meta Analyst. Results: Ten studies (2,277 participants) were included in the review. There were no significant differences between radial and femoral access in terms of successful recanalization (0R: 1.01; 95% CI, 0.59,1.73; p=0.98), complete recanalization (OR: 1.08; 95% CI, 0.60,1.94; p=0.81), favorable functional outcomes (0R: 0.86; 95% CI, 0.53,1.41; p=0.56), first-pass reperfusion (OR: 0.89; 95% CI, 0.67,1.19; p=0.44), number of passes (MD: 0.10; 95% CI, -0.13,0.33; p=0.4), access-to-reperfusion time (MD: -3.92; 95% CI, -9.49,1.65; p=0.17), or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR: 0.95; 95% CI, 0.55,1.65; p=0.86). However, access site complications were significantly less frequent in the TRA group as compared with the TFA group (OR: 0.21; 95% CI, 0.08,0.60; p=0.004). Meta-regression showed no significant associations for publication year, mean age, gender, or baseline NIHSS scores with clinical outcomes. Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that TRA and TFA provide comparable outcomes in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke, with TRA resulting in fewer access site complications. Further large-scale randomized trials are recommended to confirm these findings and potentially support a shift towards TRA in neurovascular procedures.