Abstract 4147445: Framingham risk and major adverse cardiovascular events among patients with hypertension ineligible for SPRINT

Background: Among older adults with hypertension and increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), the SPRINT trial demonstrated benefit of intensive BP-lowering. However, several categories of individuals who are at increased CVD risk were not included in SPRINT, including persons with diabetes, advanced chronic kidney disease [CKD], or younger than age 50 years. Objectives: In an integrated health system, we aimed to compare the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients with hypertension who (1) met all eligibility criteria for SPRINT and met all inclusion criteria for SPRINT but were excluded due to (2) diabetes, (3) advanced CKD, or (4) age <50 years. Methods: In this retrospective analysis of electronic health records (EHR) from Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States between 2010-2018, we identified patients aged 18 years or older with a systolic BP 130-180mm Hg at increased risk of CVD as defined in SPRINT (Framingham predicted CVD risk>15%, prior CVD, or CKD with eGFR 20 to <60 mL/min/1.73m 2 ). We compared MACE with Kaplan-Meier analysis among those who were (1) eligible for SPRINT, (2) with diabetes, (3) with stage 4 or 5 CKD (eGFR <20 mL/min/1.73m 2 not on dialysis), (4) or younger than 50 years. Results: In total, 104,757 individuals (47.3% female, 47.5% non-Hispanic Black) were identified with elevated BP and at increased CVD risk. Of these, 54.2% met all eligibility criteria for SPRINT, 32.2% had diabetes, 3.8% had advanced CKD, and 9.9% were aged 18-49y. At baseline, the 10-year Framingham CVD risk for each subgroup was: SPRINT-eligible: 24.2%; among those ineligible for SPRINT, those with diabetes: 32.2%; CKD: 25.0%; and adults aged 18-49 years: 18.8%. Over a median follow-up of 1.8 (IQR 0.9-3.8) years, the 3-year cumulative incidence of MACE ( FIGURE ) was SPRINT-eligible: 9.1% (95% CI 8.8-9.5%); among those ineligible for SPRINT, those with diabetes: 12.6% (12.1-13.0%); CKD: 18.8% (17.3-20.3%); and adults aged 18-49 years: 7.7% (7.0-8.4%). Conclusions: A large proportion of patients with hypertension in a diverse real-world sample were not eligible for SPRINT. However, CVD event rates were high in all groups, which suggests risk-based approaches to BP-lowering should be evaluated among those at increased CVD risk not included in SPRINT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4147445
Primary Topic
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4147445: Framingham risk and major adverse cardiovascular events among patients with hypertension ineligible for SPRINT

Nicola Lancki, Chiadi E. Ndumele, Dhruv S. Kazi, Donald M. Lloyd‐Jones et al.
Circulation
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
article

Abstract 4147445: Framingham risk and major adverse cardiovascular events among patients with hypertension ineligible for SPRINT

Nicola Lancki, Chiadi E. Ndumele, Dhruv S. Kazi, Donald M. Lloyd‐Jones, Celeena Jefferson, Norrina B. Allen, Suma Vupputuri, Faraz S. Ahmad, Stephen D. Persell, Xiaoning Huang, Lucia C. Petito, Nilay S. Shah, Sadiya S. Khan
article en

Abstract

Background: Among older adults with hypertension and increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), the SPRINT trial demonstrated benefit of intensive BP-lowering. However, several categories of individuals who are at increased CVD risk were not included in SPRINT, including persons with diabetes, advanced chronic kidney disease [CKD], or younger than age 50 years. Objectives: In an integrated health system, we aimed to compare the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients with hypertension who (1) met all eligibility criteria for SPRINT and met all inclusion criteria for SPRINT but were excluded due to (2) diabetes, (3) advanced CKD, or (4) age <50 years. Methods: In this retrospective analysis of electronic health records (EHR) from Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States between 2010-2018, we identified patients aged 18 years or older with a systolic BP 130-180mm Hg at increased risk of CVD as defined in SPRINT (Framingham predicted CVD risk>15%, prior CVD, or CKD with eGFR 20 to <60 mL/min/1.73m 2 ). We compared MACE with Kaplan-Meier analysis among those who were (1) eligible for SPRINT, (2) with diabetes, (3) with stage 4 or 5 CKD (eGFR <20 mL/min/1.73m 2 not on dialysis), (4) or younger than 50 years. Results: In total, 104,757 individuals (47.3% female, 47.5% non-Hispanic Black) were identified with elevated BP and at increased CVD risk. Of these, 54.2% met all eligibility criteria for SPRINT, 32.2% had diabetes, 3.8% had advanced CKD, and 9.9% were aged 18-49y. At baseline, the 10-year Framingham CVD risk for each subgroup was: SPRINT-eligible: 24.2%; among those ineligible for SPRINT, those with diabetes: 32.2%; CKD: 25.0%; and adults aged 18-49 years: 18.8%. Over a median follow-up of 1.8 (IQR 0.9-3.8) years, the 3-year cumulative incidence of MACE ( FIGURE ) was SPRINT-eligible: 9.1% (95% CI 8.8-9.5%); among those ineligible for SPRINT, those with diabetes: 12.6% (12.1-13.0%); CKD: 18.8% (17.3-20.3%); and adults aged 18-49 years: 7.7% (7.0-8.4%). Conclusions: A large proportion of patients with hypertension in a diverse real-world sample were not eligible for SPRINT. However, CVD event rates were high in all groups, which suggests risk-based approaches to BP-lowering should be evaluated among those at increased CVD risk not included in SPRINT.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Northwestern University (US), Kaiser Permanente (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital (US), Johns Hopkins Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.