Abstract 4147256: The Effect of Obesity on Outcomes of Mechanical Circulatory Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Insight from the National Inpatient Sample Database

Introduction: Studies suggest a complex relationship between body mass index (BMI) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes. However, the effect of obesity on in-hospital outcomes of PCI with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) has not been established. Objective: To characterize outcomes of PCI with MCS for AMICS in patients with and without obesity. Methods: In the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016-2020, we identified patients with AMICS treated with MCS with obesity (BMI 30.0-39.9) or normal BMI (20.0-24.9). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiac arrest, stroke, acute kidney injury, bleeding, acute respiratory failure, palliative consults, hospital length of stay (LOS), and total charges. Multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for baseline characteristics and estimated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: 5270 patients met study criteria (4870 obese). Obese and normal weight patients had a mean age of 69.8 vs. 63.5 years and male sex 78.1% vs. 71.3%. Obese patients had more hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and previous myocardial infarction (Table 1A). There was no difference in mortality [OR 0.84, CI (0.41-1.71), P=0.623] or the secondary outcomes (Table 1B). Normal weight was associated with longer LOS (13.0 vs. 8.5 days) and higher charges ($325,926.3 vs. $294,629.1). Conclusion: There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality or secondary outcomes between obese and normal-weight AMICS patients treated with PCI and MCS. PCI with MCS may be performed safely in AMICS patients with and without obesity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4147256
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4147256: The Effect of Obesity on Outcomes of Mechanical Circulatory Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Insight from the National Inpatient Sample Database

Favour Nelson, Andrew M. Goldsweig, Ovie Okorare, Dipal Patel et al.
2 citations
Circulation
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
1.38
article

Abstract 4147256: The Effect of Obesity on Outcomes of Mechanical Circulatory Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Insight from the National Inpatient Sample Database

Favour Nelson, Andrew M. Goldsweig, Ovie Okorare, Dipal Patel, Gabriel Alugba, Oghenetejiri Gbegbaje, Chidubem Ezenna, Garly Saint Croix, Uzoma N Okey-Ndeche
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Studies suggest a complex relationship between body mass index (BMI) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes. However, the effect of obesity on in-hospital outcomes of PCI with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) has not been established. Objective: To characterize outcomes of PCI with MCS for AMICS in patients with and without obesity. Methods: In the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016-2020, we identified patients with AMICS treated with MCS with obesity (BMI 30.0-39.9) or normal BMI (20.0-24.9). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiac arrest, stroke, acute kidney injury, bleeding, acute respiratory failure, palliative consults, hospital length of stay (LOS), and total charges. Multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for baseline characteristics and estimated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: 5270 patients met study criteria (4870 obese). Obese and normal weight patients had a mean age of 69.8 vs. 63.5 years and male sex 78.1% vs. 71.3%. Obese patients had more hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and previous myocardial infarction (Table 1A). There was no difference in mortality [OR 0.84, CI (0.41-1.71), P=0.623] or the secondary outcomes (Table 1B). Normal weight was associated with longer LOS (13.0 vs. 8.5 days) and higher charges ($325,926.3 vs. $294,629.1). Conclusion: There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality or secondary outcomes between obese and normal-weight AMICS patients treated with PCI and MCS. PCI with MCS may be performed safely in AMICS patients with and without obesity.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Geisinger Medical Center (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US), Baystate Medical Center (US), Englewood Hospital and Medical Center (US), Vassar Brothers Medical Center (US), Hartford Financial Services (United States)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.