Abstract 4147261: Explainable AI Better Predicts 3-Year MACE Risk Compared to Clinical and ASCVD Models in the UK Biobank Cohort

Hypothesis: Artificial intelligence (AI)-derived retinal microvascular architecture from fundus images predicts time to MACE events. Objectives: To establish associations of retinal vessel features with 3-year MACE risk, and compare AI-derived retinal vessel-based MACE risk with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk calculator. Methods: Baseline retinal fundus scans were identified for 2120 patients with no prior CVD events, from UK Biobank Cohort. Retinal features such as angle, tortuosity, curvature, and caliber, were extracted (Fig. A). A Cox proportional hazards model was trained using demographics and clinical risk factors (M clin ). AI-derived top 6 features extracted from retinal vessel analysis (M clin+AI ) were integrated and compared with ASCVD risk calculator. The models were trained on 1060 individuals (50%) and validated on a holdout set of 1060 individuals (50%). Performance was assessed using the concordance index (C-Index), hazard ratio (HR), and Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves, and models were compared using the Likelihood Ratio Test (L.R.T.) Results: In the holdout set, M clin+AI risk score achieved a C-index of 0.688, HR of 4.59 (2.66 -7.93, p<0.001) for 3-year MACE event prediction compared to M clin (C-index=0.667, 3.30 (95% CI: 2.05-5.32), p<0.001). M clin+AI was significantly better (L.R.T p<0.001) than ASCVD risk calculator (C-index=0.640, 3.21 (95% CI: 1.84-5.60), p<0.001), suggesting that retinal features hold promise for capturing novel information not included in current risk assessment tools, enabling improved immediate risk evaluation. M clin+AI demonstrates a notable advantage over other models for MACE risk prediction over 3, 5, and 10-year periods, with highest predictive power in the shorter term. Conclusion: AI-derived retinal features are strongly associated with 3-year MACE. Further multisite prospective validation is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4147261
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4147261: Explainable AI Better Predicts 3-Year MACE Risk Compared to Clinical and ASCVD Models in the UK Biobank Cohort

Sudeshna Sil Kar, Gourav Modanwal, Rohan Dhamdhere, Sadeer G Al-Kindi et al.
Circulation
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Abstract 4147261: Explainable AI Better Predicts 3-Year MACE Risk Compared to Clinical and ASCVD Models in the UK Biobank Cohort

Sudeshna Sil Kar, Gourav Modanwal, Rohan Dhamdhere, Sadeer G Al-Kindi, Amritpal Singh
article en

Abstract

Hypothesis: Artificial intelligence (AI)-derived retinal microvascular architecture from fundus images predicts time to MACE events. Objectives: To establish associations of retinal vessel features with 3-year MACE risk, and compare AI-derived retinal vessel-based MACE risk with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk calculator. Methods: Baseline retinal fundus scans were identified for 2120 patients with no prior CVD events, from UK Biobank Cohort. Retinal features such as angle, tortuosity, curvature, and caliber, were extracted (Fig. A). A Cox proportional hazards model was trained using demographics and clinical risk factors (M clin ). AI-derived top 6 features extracted from retinal vessel analysis (M clin+AI ) were integrated and compared with ASCVD risk calculator. The models were trained on 1060 individuals (50%) and validated on a holdout set of 1060 individuals (50%). Performance was assessed using the concordance index (C-Index), hazard ratio (HR), and Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves, and models were compared using the Likelihood Ratio Test (L.R.T.) Results: In the holdout set, M clin+AI risk score achieved a C-index of 0.688, HR of 4.59 (2.66 -7.93, p<0.001) for 3-year MACE event prediction compared to M clin (C-index=0.667, 3.30 (95% CI: 2.05-5.32), p<0.001). M clin+AI was significantly better (L.R.T p<0.001) than ASCVD risk calculator (C-index=0.640, 3.21 (95% CI: 1.84-5.60), p<0.001), suggesting that retinal features hold promise for capturing novel information not included in current risk assessment tools, enabling improved immediate risk evaluation. M clin+AI demonstrates a notable advantage over other models for MACE risk prediction over 3, 5, and 10-year periods, with highest predictive power in the shorter term. Conclusion: AI-derived retinal features are strongly associated with 3-year MACE. Further multisite prospective validation is warranted.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Emory University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.