Abstract 4147468: Using Structured Queries versus Retrieval Augmented Generation Enabled GPT-4 to Phenotype Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Background: Using Electronic Health Record (EHR) data to accurately phenotype patients for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is crucial for clinical decision-making and research. Traditional methods using structured queries often lack specificity or sensitivity. We developed RECTIFIER, an AI-based clinical phenotyping tool. This study compares the performance metrics of structured queries against RECTIFIER in determining types of ASCVD. Methods: We conducted an analysis using EHR to compare the performance of structured queries with RECTIFIER for identifying various ASCVD types. The dataset included 998 patients with diabetes. Structured queries identified ASCVD types using ICD, CPT, and HCPCS codes, while RECTIFIER analyzed unstructured clinical notes within the previous year to identify the same components. Three expert clinicians adjudicated each ASCVD component by reviewing patients’ charts. Performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, were calculated for both methods. Results: Structured queries demonstrated similar or lower sensitivity in identifying ASCVD types compared to RECTIFIER (Figure). The sensitivity of structured queries to determine any ASCVD was significantly lower than that of RECTIFIER (Structured: 67.8%, RECTIFIER: 87.3%). Conversely, structured queries exhibited similar specificity with RECTIFIER except for greater performance in PCI and coronary revascularization which showed small but statistically significant differences (Structured: 100% and 95.1%, RECTIFIER: 98.1% and 90.1%, respectively). Conclusion: The higher sensitivity of RECTIFIER in identifying ASCVD components suggests its potential for improving patient phenotyping. However, the greater specificity of structured queries underscores its utility in specific procedural identification. An integrated approach, using RECTIFIER for general phenotyping and structured queries for procedure-specific components, may enhance the accuracy and efficiency of ASCVD identification. Future studies should explore optimized prompting strategies to further refine structured queries' performance and validate these findings in larger, diverse populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4147468
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4147468: Using Structured Queries versus Retrieval Augmented Generation Enabled GPT-4 to Phenotype Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Shahzad Hassan, Samuel Aronson, David Zelle, Alexander Blood et al.
Circulation
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

Abstract 4147468: Using Structured Queries versus Retrieval Augmented Generation Enabled GPT-4 to Phenotype Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Shahzad Hassan, Samuel Aronson, David Zelle, Alexander Blood, Caitlin Colling, Ji-Yeon Shin, Michael Oates, Lee‐Shing Chang, Kavishwar B. Wagholikar, Matthew Varugheese, Benjamin M. Scirica, Charlotte Mailly, Ozan Ünlü, Dan Gabovitch, Fei Wang
article en

Abstract

Background: Using Electronic Health Record (EHR) data to accurately phenotype patients for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is crucial for clinical decision-making and research. Traditional methods using structured queries often lack specificity or sensitivity. We developed RECTIFIER, an AI-based clinical phenotyping tool. This study compares the performance metrics of structured queries against RECTIFIER in determining types of ASCVD. Methods: We conducted an analysis using EHR to compare the performance of structured queries with RECTIFIER for identifying various ASCVD types. The dataset included 998 patients with diabetes. Structured queries identified ASCVD types using ICD, CPT, and HCPCS codes, while RECTIFIER analyzed unstructured clinical notes within the previous year to identify the same components. Three expert clinicians adjudicated each ASCVD component by reviewing patients’ charts. Performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, were calculated for both methods. Results: Structured queries demonstrated similar or lower sensitivity in identifying ASCVD types compared to RECTIFIER (Figure). The sensitivity of structured queries to determine any ASCVD was significantly lower than that of RECTIFIER (Structured: 67.8%, RECTIFIER: 87.3%). Conversely, structured queries exhibited similar specificity with RECTIFIER except for greater performance in PCI and coronary revascularization which showed small but statistically significant differences (Structured: 100% and 95.1%, RECTIFIER: 98.1% and 90.1%, respectively). Conclusion: The higher sensitivity of RECTIFIER in identifying ASCVD components suggests its potential for improving patient phenotyping. However, the greater specificity of structured queries underscores its utility in specific procedural identification. An integrated approach, using RECTIFIER for general phenotyping and structured queries for procedure-specific components, may enhance the accuracy and efficiency of ASCVD identification. Future studies should explore optimized prompting strategies to further refine structured queries' performance and validate these findings in larger, diverse populations.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.