Abstract Sa101: Prehospital advanced airway management across age groups in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Registry-based cohort study from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epidemiologic Registry

Background: Emergency medical services clinicians commonly perform advanced airway management (AAM: i.e., supraglottic airway placement and endotracheal intubation) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Nevertheless, the heterogeneity of the treatment effect of prehospital AAM across age groups is still unclear. Aim: To determine the association between prehospital AAM and survival after OHCA, compared with no AAM, across age groups. Methods: This cohort study used the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epidemiologic Registry database, a prospective OHCA registry at ten sites in the US and Canada from 2011 through 2015. Patients were stratified into ten sub-cohorts based on their first documented rhythm (shockable or non-shockable) and five age groups (0-9 years; 10-24; 25-44; 45-64; or ≥65) given the potential impact of rhythm and age on effect modification. To address resuscitation time bias, patients who received AAM during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were sequentially matched with patients at risk of receiving AAM within the same minute based on time-dependent propensity scores. Matching was performed in each sub-cohort, and the matched sub-cohorts were integrated for the main analysis. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Results: Of the 44,403 eligible patients, 39,157 (88.2%) received prehospital AAM during CPR. After time-dependent propensity score sequential matching, 29,973 who received AAM were matched with patients who had not yet received AAM at the same minute. AAM was associated with survival: 5.4% vs 4.8%, risk ratio (RR) 1.40 (95% CI 1.30-1.51). The associations were similar toward better survival in both the shockable (RR 1.27 [95% CI 1.17-1.38]) and non-shockable (RR 1.75 [95% CI 1.53-2.01]) cohorts. There was no apparent heterogeneity of the treatment effect of AAM on survival in all age groups: 0-9 years, RR 1.07 (95% CI 0.45-2.56); 10-24 years, 1.61 (1.07-2.45); 25-44 years, 1.68 (1.35-2.10); 45-64 years, 1.33 (1.19-1.48); 65 years or older, 1.40 (1.23-1.59). Conclusions: In this study of the large multicenter OHCA registry in North America, prehospital AAM was associated with survival to hospital discharge regardless of the first documented rhythm. No apparent heterogeneity was found in the associations between AAM and survival among all age groups, suggesting that both pediatric and adult populations might benefit from prehospital AAM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.sa101
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract Sa101: Prehospital advanced airway management across age groups in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Registry-based cohort study from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epidemiologic Registry

Junichi Izawa, Clifton W. Callaway, Masashi Okubo, Sho Komukai
Circulation
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Abstract Sa101: Prehospital advanced airway management across age groups in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Registry-based cohort study from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epidemiologic Registry

Junichi Izawa, Clifton W. Callaway, Masashi Okubo, Sho Komukai
article en

Abstract

Background: Emergency medical services clinicians commonly perform advanced airway management (AAM: i.e., supraglottic airway placement and endotracheal intubation) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Nevertheless, the heterogeneity of the treatment effect of prehospital AAM across age groups is still unclear. Aim: To determine the association between prehospital AAM and survival after OHCA, compared with no AAM, across age groups. Methods: This cohort study used the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epidemiologic Registry database, a prospective OHCA registry at ten sites in the US and Canada from 2011 through 2015. Patients were stratified into ten sub-cohorts based on their first documented rhythm (shockable or non-shockable) and five age groups (0-9 years; 10-24; 25-44; 45-64; or ≥65) given the potential impact of rhythm and age on effect modification. To address resuscitation time bias, patients who received AAM during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were sequentially matched with patients at risk of receiving AAM within the same minute based on time-dependent propensity scores. Matching was performed in each sub-cohort, and the matched sub-cohorts were integrated for the main analysis. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Results: Of the 44,403 eligible patients, 39,157 (88.2%) received prehospital AAM during CPR. After time-dependent propensity score sequential matching, 29,973 who received AAM were matched with patients who had not yet received AAM at the same minute. AAM was associated with survival: 5.4% vs 4.8%, risk ratio (RR) 1.40 (95% CI 1.30-1.51). The associations were similar toward better survival in both the shockable (RR 1.27 [95% CI 1.17-1.38]) and non-shockable (RR 1.75 [95% CI 1.53-2.01]) cohorts. There was no apparent heterogeneity of the treatment effect of AAM on survival in all age groups: 0-9 years, RR 1.07 (95% CI 0.45-2.56); 10-24 years, 1.61 (1.07-2.45); 25-44 years, 1.68 (1.35-2.10); 45-64 years, 1.33 (1.19-1.48); 65 years or older, 1.40 (1.23-1.59). Conclusions: In this study of the large multicenter OHCA registry in North America, prehospital AAM was associated with survival to hospital discharge regardless of the first documented rhythm. No apparent heterogeneity was found in the associations between AAM and survival among all age groups, suggesting that both pediatric and adult populations might benefit from prehospital AAM.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Pittsburgh (US), Okinawa Prefectural Chubu Hospital (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.