Abstract 4147560: Interoperable and Scalable Electronic Clinical Quality Measurement for Appropriate Use of Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation in a Multicenter Health System

Background: Anticoagulation (AC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at high risk for stroke is strongly recommended in guidelines, but tracking the optimal use of AC at scale and across hospital systems is challenging due to the need to examine both thrombotic and bleeding risks that often factor in clinical decisions. We propose a novel electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) based on a computable phenotyping algorithm developed for and applied to a common data model (CDM) to enable at-scale assessments of CHA 2 DS 2 VASc and HAS-BLED to patients with AF in a multi-hospital health system. Methods: In patients with AF, we extracted CHA 2 DS 2 VASc and HAS-BLED scores by mapping individual components to standardized concepts from the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership CDM concept set building tool, ATLAS. Clinician experts pursued manual curation of applicable concepts spanning demographics, conditions, laboratory values, medications, procedures, and vital signs, based on either the presence/absence of conditions in the patient EHR, or the given threshold of lab values or vital signs. We then assessed patients’ AC status across stroke and bleeding risk ranges [A]. Results: Across 5 hospitals and clinic sites, there were 64,632 patients with AF, mean age 74 (SD 14) with 27,846 (43%) female, and 4,060 (8%) Black who interacted with the health system within the past year. The mean CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score was 4.5 (SD 2.0) and HAS-BLED was 3.0 (SD 1.5). For those on AC, the mean CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score was 4.8 (SD 2.0) versus 3.8 (SD 2.1) for those not on AC [B], while the mean HAS-BLED score for those on AC was 3.2 (SD 1.5) vs 2.7 (SD 1.5) for those not on AC [C]. By score, 92% had a stroke risk of 2% or greater, and 66% of these patients were on AC, with a mean HAS-BLED score of 3.2 (SD 1.5). The most common contributors to a HAS-BLED score of 2 or greater were medication exposure predisposing to bleeding (90%), age greater than 65 (85%), prior bleeding event (47%), and uncontrolled hypertension (46%). Across hospital sites, the proportion of patients with AF with a CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score of 2 or more and HAS-BLED score of 4 or less not on AC varied from 58% (Greenwich Hospital) to 72% (Bridgeport Hospital) [D]. Conclusion: We demonstrate the ability of a scalable EHR-native eCQM that accounts for thrombotic and bleeding risk at scale to monitor the quality of care, with gaps in care noted in a large diverse health system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4147560
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4147560: Interoperable and Scalable Electronic Clinical Quality Measurement for Appropriate Use of Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation in a Multicenter Health System

Lovedeep Dhingra, Rohan Khera, Phyllis Thangaraj
Circulation
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4147560: Interoperable and Scalable Electronic Clinical Quality Measurement for Appropriate Use of Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation in a Multicenter Health System

Lovedeep Dhingra, Rohan Khera, Phyllis Thangaraj
article en

Abstract

Background: Anticoagulation (AC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at high risk for stroke is strongly recommended in guidelines, but tracking the optimal use of AC at scale and across hospital systems is challenging due to the need to examine both thrombotic and bleeding risks that often factor in clinical decisions. We propose a novel electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) based on a computable phenotyping algorithm developed for and applied to a common data model (CDM) to enable at-scale assessments of CHA 2 DS 2 VASc and HAS-BLED to patients with AF in a multi-hospital health system. Methods: In patients with AF, we extracted CHA 2 DS 2 VASc and HAS-BLED scores by mapping individual components to standardized concepts from the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership CDM concept set building tool, ATLAS. Clinician experts pursued manual curation of applicable concepts spanning demographics, conditions, laboratory values, medications, procedures, and vital signs, based on either the presence/absence of conditions in the patient EHR, or the given threshold of lab values or vital signs. We then assessed patients’ AC status across stroke and bleeding risk ranges [A]. Results: Across 5 hospitals and clinic sites, there were 64,632 patients with AF, mean age 74 (SD 14) with 27,846 (43%) female, and 4,060 (8%) Black who interacted with the health system within the past year. The mean CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score was 4.5 (SD 2.0) and HAS-BLED was 3.0 (SD 1.5). For those on AC, the mean CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score was 4.8 (SD 2.0) versus 3.8 (SD 2.1) for those not on AC [B], while the mean HAS-BLED score for those on AC was 3.2 (SD 1.5) vs 2.7 (SD 1.5) for those not on AC [C]. By score, 92% had a stroke risk of 2% or greater, and 66% of these patients were on AC, with a mean HAS-BLED score of 3.2 (SD 1.5). The most common contributors to a HAS-BLED score of 2 or greater were medication exposure predisposing to bleeding (90%), age greater than 65 (85%), prior bleeding event (47%), and uncontrolled hypertension (46%). Across hospital sites, the proportion of patients with AF with a CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score of 2 or more and HAS-BLED score of 4 or less not on AC varied from 58% (Greenwich Hospital) to 72% (Bridgeport Hospital) [D]. Conclusion: We demonstrate the ability of a scalable EHR-native eCQM that accounts for thrombotic and bleeding risk at scale to monitor the quality of care, with gaps in care noted in a large diverse health system.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Yale University (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.