Abstract 4147015: Association between Polysocial Risk Score and Cardiovascular Health among Women of Reproductive Age in the American Heart Association’s Research Goes Red

Introduction: Hypertension (HTN) prevalence is worsening among women of reproductive age (18-44 years), leading to higher maternal morbidity and mortality rates. We sought to evaluate social risks and cardiovascular health (CVH) among women aged 18-44 years, in a national registry. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of participants enrolled in the American Heart Association Research Goes Red Registry, who responded to questionnaires on heart health and social risks. Adverse social risks were measured using a polysocial risk score ranging from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating greater social disadvantage. The polysocial risk score included variables from several domains: sociodemographic information, living situation, food security, transportation, utilities, safety, and financial strain. CVH was assessed by the number of CVH risk factors based on Life’s Essential 8: diet, physical activity, smoking, blood pressure, blood sugar, body mass index, and cholesterol, where a lower number of risk factors indicates more optimal CVH. Linear regression models were used to assess the association between polysocial risk score and CVH. Results: Among the 637 women (mean age range 18-29 years, 30% Non-Hispanic Black), 64% had polysocial risk scores less than 7, while 36% had scores greater than 7. Most participants were married or cohabitating (66%) and had some college education or higher (87%). Financial strain was reported by 51%, with 47% earning less than $50,000 annually. In terms of cardiovascular health, 33% had diabetes, 46% had high cholesterol, 44% had high blood pressure, and 69% had a high body mass index. High polysocial scores (scores > 7) were significantly associated with increased cardiovascular health risk factors (coefficient = 0.4733, p < 0.001), while lower polysocial scores (scores < 7) were not significantly associated with cardiovascular health risk (coefficient = 0.0357, p = 0.229). Additionally, Spearman’s rank correlation showed a moderate positive relationship (Spearman's rho = 0.2395, p = 0.0000), indicating that as polysocial scores increase, the number of CVH risk factors also increases (Figure). Discussion: Women of reproductive age with high number of social risks are at a significantly increased risk of suboptimal cardiovascular health. Screening for social needs and developing public health interventions tailored for women with high social burdens must be prioritized to improve cardiovascular health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4147015
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4147015: Association between Polysocial Risk Score and Cardiovascular Health among Women of Reproductive Age in the American Heart Association’s Research Goes Red

Yaa Kwapong, Yvonne Y Commodore-Mensah, Crystal Evans, Dhananjay Vaidya et al.
Circulation
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
article

Abstract 4147015: Association between Polysocial Risk Score and Cardiovascular Health among Women of Reproductive Age in the American Heart Association’s Research Goes Red

Yaa Kwapong, Yvonne Y Commodore-Mensah, Crystal Evans, Dhananjay Vaidya, Pamela Ouyang, Faith Metlock, Garima Sharma
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Hypertension (HTN) prevalence is worsening among women of reproductive age (18-44 years), leading to higher maternal morbidity and mortality rates. We sought to evaluate social risks and cardiovascular health (CVH) among women aged 18-44 years, in a national registry. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of participants enrolled in the American Heart Association Research Goes Red Registry, who responded to questionnaires on heart health and social risks. Adverse social risks were measured using a polysocial risk score ranging from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating greater social disadvantage. The polysocial risk score included variables from several domains: sociodemographic information, living situation, food security, transportation, utilities, safety, and financial strain. CVH was assessed by the number of CVH risk factors based on Life’s Essential 8: diet, physical activity, smoking, blood pressure, blood sugar, body mass index, and cholesterol, where a lower number of risk factors indicates more optimal CVH. Linear regression models were used to assess the association between polysocial risk score and CVH. Results: Among the 637 women (mean age range 18-29 years, 30% Non-Hispanic Black), 64% had polysocial risk scores less than 7, while 36% had scores greater than 7. Most participants were married or cohabitating (66%) and had some college education or higher (87%). Financial strain was reported by 51%, with 47% earning less than $50,000 annually. In terms of cardiovascular health, 33% had diabetes, 46% had high cholesterol, 44% had high blood pressure, and 69% had a high body mass index. High polysocial scores (scores > 7) were significantly associated with increased cardiovascular health risk factors (coefficient = 0.4733, p < 0.001), while lower polysocial scores (scores < 7) were not significantly associated with cardiovascular health risk (coefficient = 0.0357, p = 0.229). Additionally, Spearman’s rank correlation showed a moderate positive relationship (Spearman's rho = 0.2395, p = 0.0000), indicating that as polysocial scores increase, the number of CVH risk factors also increases (Figure). Discussion: Women of reproductive age with high number of social risks are at a significantly increased risk of suboptimal cardiovascular health. Screening for social needs and developing public health interventions tailored for women with high social burdens must be prioritized to improve cardiovascular health.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Inova Fairfax Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.