Abstract 4147238: Targeting Current Delivery During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation May Improve Ablation Success

Background: Contemporary power-controlled radiofrequency (RF) ablation prioritizes power, force, and time. However, variables such as impedance and current also greatly impact ablation lesion formation. The appropriate current values to target at various pulmonary vein (PV) regions are not well established. Objective: To characterize 1) the range of current (mA) delivery with standard ablation and impedance (ohms) values at PV ostia, and 2) the impact of maximum current achieved on freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) at one year. Methods: One hundred fifteen consecutive paroxysmal AF patients at our institution between 2020-2021 undergoing first-time RF PV isolation were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline impedance (ohms), impedance drop, power, force, and time were compiled and separated by ostial PV site (CARTO®). Current was calculated based on Power=current x resistance. Calculated current was then compared in a small cohort of patients with the displayed current on the Smart Ablate® system. Results: Of all patients, 27 patients had atrial fibrillation recurrence within one year. Calculated current was lower than the displayed Smart Ablate® current but had reliable correlation. Baseline impedance was higher in the roof and posterior wall compared to anterior/inferior regions. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean maximum current achieved between patients with AF recurrence vs those without in the regions of the left posterior wall (543 mA vs 564 mA, p = 0.049), left roof (556 mA vs 575 mA, p = 0.043), and right roof (559 mA vs 578 mA, p = 0.042). Conclusion: Current delivery during RF ablation is dependent on baseline impedance and the impedance drop achieved. We noted significant differences in delivered current in those with and without AF recurrence at the left posterior wall/roof and right roof. Titrating ablation parameters to achieve effective current delivery may be a promising intraprocedural strategy for AF ablation success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4147238
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4147238: Targeting Current Delivery During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation May Improve Ablation Success

Ryan G. Aleong, Kishan Padalia, Wendy S. Tzou, Matthew M. Zipse et al.
Circulation
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4147238: Targeting Current Delivery During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation May Improve Ablation Success

Ryan G. Aleong, Kishan Padalia, Wendy S. Tzou, Matthew M. Zipse, Lucasz Cerbin, Michael Rosenberg, Alex Grubb, Carmel Ashur, Syed Rafay Ali Sabzwari, Daniel Varela, Amneet Sandhu, Bilal Saqi, Joseph Adewumi, Johannes von Alvensleben, Alexis Z. Tumolo, Christopher B. Barrett, Lohit Garg, Paul Varosy, Rachel Murphy
article en

Abstract

Background: Contemporary power-controlled radiofrequency (RF) ablation prioritizes power, force, and time. However, variables such as impedance and current also greatly impact ablation lesion formation. The appropriate current values to target at various pulmonary vein (PV) regions are not well established. Objective: To characterize 1) the range of current (mA) delivery with standard ablation and impedance (ohms) values at PV ostia, and 2) the impact of maximum current achieved on freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) at one year. Methods: One hundred fifteen consecutive paroxysmal AF patients at our institution between 2020-2021 undergoing first-time RF PV isolation were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline impedance (ohms), impedance drop, power, force, and time were compiled and separated by ostial PV site (CARTO®). Current was calculated based on Power=current x resistance. Calculated current was then compared in a small cohort of patients with the displayed current on the Smart Ablate® system. Results: Of all patients, 27 patients had atrial fibrillation recurrence within one year. Calculated current was lower than the displayed Smart Ablate® current but had reliable correlation. Baseline impedance was higher in the roof and posterior wall compared to anterior/inferior regions. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean maximum current achieved between patients with AF recurrence vs those without in the regions of the left posterior wall (543 mA vs 564 mA, p = 0.049), left roof (556 mA vs 575 mA, p = 0.043), and right roof (559 mA vs 578 mA, p = 0.042). Conclusion: Current delivery during RF ablation is dependent on baseline impedance and the impedance drop achieved. We noted significant differences in delivered current in those with and without AF recurrence at the left posterior wall/roof and right roof. Titrating ablation parameters to achieve effective current delivery may be a promising intraprocedural strategy for AF ablation success.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Denver Health Medical Center (US), Children's Hospital Colorado (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.