Abstract Sa905: Differential Outcomes After Cerebrovascular Accident-Related Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest With and Without Initial Shockable Rhythm

Backgrounds: Although the prognosis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) may be worse in patients with cerebrovascular accident (CVA) than in those with other etiologies, clinical outcomes are not fully elucidated, particularly between CVA-related OHCA with and without initial shockable rhythm. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic outcome associated with initial shockable and non-shockable rhythms in patients with CVA-related OHCA. Methods: Using a nationwide OHCA registry database from 2005 to 2021 in Japan, a cohort of 2,059,417 patients with OHCA were retrospectively reviewed. After excluding patients aged < 18 years and with missing data on initial rhythm, 1,934,897 individuals were included and were divided into two groups according to the initial rhythm (shockable or non-shockable group). The primary outcomes of this study were all-cause mortality and neurologically favorable survival, defined by the cerebral performance category score of 1 or 2, at 1 month. Characteristics and outcomes of OHCA patients with and without CVA were compared between the shockable and non-shockable groups. Results: Overall, patients with CVA-related OHCA were younger and more likely to be women than those without. In the shockable group, patients with CVA had a lower number of defibrillation attempts and a higher likelihood of achieving prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (31.3% vs. 28.4%, p<0.0001). However, a neurologically favorable survival rate was significantly lower in patients with CVA than in those without (10.5% vs. 18.6%, p<0.0001). In the non-shockable group, the rates of prehospital ROSC (13.2% vs. 5.7%, p<0.001) and 30-day survival (3.2% vs. 2.8%, p<0.0001) were significantly higher in patients with CVA, while neurologically favorable survival was similar between patients with and without CVA (0.9% vs. 0.8%, p=0.439) (Table and Figure). Conclusions: Although patients with CVA as an etiology of OHCA were more likely to achieve prehospital ROSC than those with other etiologies of cardiac arrest irrespective of initial rhythm, a neurologically favorable survival rate was lower in patients with CVA, particularly in the shockable group. Further studies are warranted to clarify the underlying mechanisms of OHCA with shockable rhythm in patients with CVA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.sa905
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract Sa905: Differential Outcomes After Cerebrovascular Accident-Related Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest With and Without Initial Shockable Rhythm

Yuichi Saito, Hideki Kitahara, Keita Tateishi, Takanori Ikeda et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Abstract Sa905: Differential Outcomes After Cerebrovascular Accident-Related Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest With and Without Initial Shockable Rhythm

Yuichi Saito, Hideki Kitahara, Keita Tateishi, Takanori Ikeda, Naohiro Yonemoto, Yoshio Kobayashi, Yoshio Tahara
article en

Abstract

Backgrounds: Although the prognosis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) may be worse in patients with cerebrovascular accident (CVA) than in those with other etiologies, clinical outcomes are not fully elucidated, particularly between CVA-related OHCA with and without initial shockable rhythm. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic outcome associated with initial shockable and non-shockable rhythms in patients with CVA-related OHCA. Methods: Using a nationwide OHCA registry database from 2005 to 2021 in Japan, a cohort of 2,059,417 patients with OHCA were retrospectively reviewed. After excluding patients aged < 18 years and with missing data on initial rhythm, 1,934,897 individuals were included and were divided into two groups according to the initial rhythm (shockable or non-shockable group). The primary outcomes of this study were all-cause mortality and neurologically favorable survival, defined by the cerebral performance category score of 1 or 2, at 1 month. Characteristics and outcomes of OHCA patients with and without CVA were compared between the shockable and non-shockable groups. Results: Overall, patients with CVA-related OHCA were younger and more likely to be women than those without. In the shockable group, patients with CVA had a lower number of defibrillation attempts and a higher likelihood of achieving prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (31.3% vs. 28.4%, p<0.0001). However, a neurologically favorable survival rate was significantly lower in patients with CVA than in those without (10.5% vs. 18.6%, p<0.0001). In the non-shockable group, the rates of prehospital ROSC (13.2% vs. 5.7%, p<0.001) and 30-day survival (3.2% vs. 2.8%, p<0.0001) were significantly higher in patients with CVA, while neurologically favorable survival was similar between patients with and without CVA (0.9% vs. 0.8%, p=0.439) (Table and Figure). Conclusions: Although patients with CVA as an etiology of OHCA were more likely to achieve prehospital ROSC than those with other etiologies of cardiac arrest irrespective of initial rhythm, a neurologically favorable survival rate was lower in patients with CVA, particularly in the shockable group. Further studies are warranted to clarify the underlying mechanisms of OHCA with shockable rhythm in patients with CVA.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Toho University (JP), Chiba University (JP), Chiba University Hospital (JP), National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center (JP), University of Toyama (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.