Abstract Sa309: The Effect of Active Thoracic Deconstriction on Circumferential Constriction Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Introduction: Active thoracic deconstriction ( ATD ) is an impactful addition to standard closed-chest CPR, thought to increase perfusion pressure (CPP) by augmenting venous return. Most studies of ATD, however, have been conducted using piston-based sternal compression CPR ( PBSC-CPR ), which can cause significant thoracic skeletal trauma. In contrast, circumferential constriction CPR ( CC-CPR ) does not cause significant structural damage, possibly preserving the thoracic-recoil-based venous return mechanism. If that is the case, CC-CPR would not benefit from ATD. Hypothesis: ATD has no effect on CC-CPR hemodynamic parameters. Methods: Ventricular fibrillation was induced in Yorkshire swine (n = 3 , ~30 kg). CPR was provided by a custom pneumatic CC-CPR system. ATD during CC-CPR was achieved by active deflation against a hard outer shell, called a cuirass, using Velcro interfaces between the animal, the belt, and the cuirass. CC-CPR was alternated in 45-second epochs between active pneumatic deflation with and without a rigid cuirass. Aortic ( Ao ) and right atrial ( RA ) pressures were measured, and coronary perfusion pressure ( CPP ) derived. ETCO2 and carotid flow were also measured. Results from all experiments were grouped by treatment type and subjected to Analysis of Variance. Results: 39 epochs in three studies were included. There were no statistically significant differences (P < 0.1) in CPP, ETCO2, or carotid flows between treatment types (Table). Conclusion: Because of its much larger contact surface area, the total possible decompression force during CC-CPR is greater than during PBSC-CPR. Despite this, the presence or absence of the rigid cuirass—and thus active deconstriction—appeared to have no impact on hemodynamic parameters. This finding suggests that the benefit of ATD during PBSC may derive from compensating for the damaged thoracic recoil mechanism, not enhancement of an extant mechanism. If the skeletal trauma of PBSC-CPR devices is avoided, the apparent benefit of ATD might be lessened. Further study to test this potentially important hypothesis is indicated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.sa309
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract Sa309: The Effect of Active Thoracic Deconstriction on Circumferential Constriction Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Alexandre Dufresne, David Gaddy, Karen L Moodie, Daniel P. Davis et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Abstract Sa309: The Effect of Active Thoracic Deconstriction on Circumferential Constriction Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Alexandre Dufresne, David Gaddy, Karen L Moodie, Daniel P. Davis, Norman A. Paradis, Christine S. Couturier, Simon F. Dufresne, Timothy J. Mader, Christopher Sims, Aidan Paradis
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Active thoracic deconstriction ( ATD ) is an impactful addition to standard closed-chest CPR, thought to increase perfusion pressure (CPP) by augmenting venous return. Most studies of ATD, however, have been conducted using piston-based sternal compression CPR ( PBSC-CPR ), which can cause significant thoracic skeletal trauma. In contrast, circumferential constriction CPR ( CC-CPR ) does not cause significant structural damage, possibly preserving the thoracic-recoil-based venous return mechanism. If that is the case, CC-CPR would not benefit from ATD. Hypothesis: ATD has no effect on CC-CPR hemodynamic parameters. Methods: Ventricular fibrillation was induced in Yorkshire swine (n = 3 , ~30 kg). CPR was provided by a custom pneumatic CC-CPR system. ATD during CC-CPR was achieved by active deflation against a hard outer shell, called a cuirass, using Velcro interfaces between the animal, the belt, and the cuirass. CC-CPR was alternated in 45-second epochs between active pneumatic deflation with and without a rigid cuirass. Aortic ( Ao ) and right atrial ( RA ) pressures were measured, and coronary perfusion pressure ( CPP ) derived. ETCO2 and carotid flow were also measured. Results from all experiments were grouped by treatment type and subjected to Analysis of Variance. Results: 39 epochs in three studies were included. There were no statistically significant differences (P < 0.1) in CPP, ETCO2, or carotid flows between treatment types (Table). Conclusion: Because of its much larger contact surface area, the total possible decompression force during CC-CPR is greater than during PBSC-CPR. Despite this, the presence or absence of the rigid cuirass—and thus active deconstriction—appeared to have no impact on hemodynamic parameters. This finding suggests that the benefit of ATD during PBSC may derive from compensating for the damaged thoracic recoil mechanism, not enhancement of an extant mechanism. If the skeletal trauma of PBSC-CPR devices is avoided, the apparent benefit of ATD might be lessened. Further study to test this potentially important hypothesis is indicated.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Baystate Medical Center (US), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), University of California San Diego (US), Baystate Health (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.