Abstract Sa902: Re-arrest Immediately after Return of Spontaneous Circulation

Introduction: Patients who regain return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after in-hospital cardiac arrest are often critically ill and at risk of re-arrest. However, re-arrest is insufficiently studied. Pre-hospital data indicate a re-arrest rate ranging from 3% to 39%. Our study aims to assess the immediate hazard of re-arrest after ROSC, depending on whether the patient’s last observed rhythm before ROSC was shockable or not. Methods: We analyzed defibrillator recordings and clinical data from 763 cardiac arrest episodes at four different hospitals. ROSC was defined as an organized ECG rhythm compatible with a pulse, accompanied by the absence of chest compressions for at least one minute. An organized rhythm with a QRS frequency ≥ 12 was categorized as pulseless electrical activity (PEA). Conversely, a QRS frequency < 12 or a flat line represented asystole. Ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia (VF/VT) was identified based on its distinct morphology. We further stratified ROSC based on whether the preceding rhythm was shockable or not. After comparing four different parametric time-to-event models, we chose the most useful one and estimated the immediate hazard of re-arrest along the timeline of resuscitation. Results: After the initial event of cardiac arrest, we observed 316 re-arrests. Among these, 68% relapsed to PEA, 25% relapsed to VF/VT, and 7% relapsed to asystole. Summarized in the figure, the initial hazard of re-arrest from ROSC after PEA or asystole to a non-shockable rhythm was 0.02 per minute. By the 9th minute, this hazard decreased to 0.01 per minute. Meanwhile, the hazard for re-arrest to a shockable rhythm remained constant at 0.01 per minute. For re-arrest from ROSC after VF/VT back to VF/VT, the hazard was 0.05 per minute initially, decreasing to 0.03 per minute by the 12th minute. The corresponding hazard for re-arrest to PEA or asystole remained at 0.01 per minute. Conclusion: The hazard of re-arrest after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) to either pulseless electrical activity (PEA), asystole, or ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia (VF/VT) varies by the last observed state before ROSC. Notably, re-arrest to VF/VT following ROSC after previous VF/VT poses the highest risk. This understanding can assist healthcare professionals in anticipating events during the critical minutes following successful resuscitation and adjusting treatment accordingly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.sa902
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract Sa902: Re-arrest Immediately after Return of Spontaneous Circulation

Eirik Skogvoll, Elisabete Aramendi, Trygve Eftestøl, Eirik Unneland et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Abstract Sa902: Re-arrest Immediately after Return of Spontaneous Circulation

Eirik Skogvoll, Elisabete Aramendi, Trygve Eftestøl, Eirik Unneland, Anders Norvik, Daniel Bergum, Trond Nordseth, Benjamin S. Abella, David G. Buckler, Jan Terje Kvaløy, Abhishek Bhardwaj
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Patients who regain return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after in-hospital cardiac arrest are often critically ill and at risk of re-arrest. However, re-arrest is insufficiently studied. Pre-hospital data indicate a re-arrest rate ranging from 3% to 39%. Our study aims to assess the immediate hazard of re-arrest after ROSC, depending on whether the patient’s last observed rhythm before ROSC was shockable or not. Methods: We analyzed defibrillator recordings and clinical data from 763 cardiac arrest episodes at four different hospitals. ROSC was defined as an organized ECG rhythm compatible with a pulse, accompanied by the absence of chest compressions for at least one minute. An organized rhythm with a QRS frequency ≥ 12 was categorized as pulseless electrical activity (PEA). Conversely, a QRS frequency < 12 or a flat line represented asystole. Ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia (VF/VT) was identified based on its distinct morphology. We further stratified ROSC based on whether the preceding rhythm was shockable or not. After comparing four different parametric time-to-event models, we chose the most useful one and estimated the immediate hazard of re-arrest along the timeline of resuscitation. Results: After the initial event of cardiac arrest, we observed 316 re-arrests. Among these, 68% relapsed to PEA, 25% relapsed to VF/VT, and 7% relapsed to asystole. Summarized in the figure, the initial hazard of re-arrest from ROSC after PEA or asystole to a non-shockable rhythm was 0.02 per minute. By the 9th minute, this hazard decreased to 0.01 per minute. Meanwhile, the hazard for re-arrest to a shockable rhythm remained constant at 0.01 per minute. For re-arrest from ROSC after VF/VT back to VF/VT, the hazard was 0.05 per minute initially, decreasing to 0.03 per minute by the 12th minute. The corresponding hazard for re-arrest to PEA or asystole remained at 0.01 per minute. Conclusion: The hazard of re-arrest after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) to either pulseless electrical activity (PEA), asystole, or ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia (VF/VT) varies by the last observed state before ROSC. Notably, re-arrest to VF/VT following ROSC after previous VF/VT poses the highest risk. This understanding can assist healthcare professionals in anticipating events during the critical minutes following successful resuscitation and adjusting treatment accordingly.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of California, Riverside (US), University of the Basque Country (ES), St Olav's University Hospital (NO), NTNU Samfunnsforskning (NO), University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Stavanger (NO), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.